Intensive Psychotherapy Training in Korean Psychiatric Residency Programs

OBJECTIVE: The authors investigated the current practice of intensive psychotherapy by residents in the department of psychiatry. METHODS: We mailed a questionnaire to 126 fourth-year psychiatry residents in order to obtain data on their clients' sociodemographic characteristics, the settings in which psychotherapy is being conducted, the effects of psychotherapy, the difficulties associated with psychotherapy, the state of supervision and the level of clients' satisfaction. RESULTS: Approximately 51.5% of the residents completed the questionnaires. The average number of clients was 4.9+/-3.8, the average number of psychotherapy sessions was 26.2+/-20.1, and 69.4% of the residents had performed insight-oriented psychotherapy. Approximately 69.8% of the fourth-year residents had received some form of supervision, and 58.7% agreed to increase the frequency of supervision. Approximately 74.2% of the cases were supervised. The average number of supervisions per case was 9.2+/-10.5. CONCLUSION: The setting in which psychotherapy is conducted, number of clients, and type of supervision varied greatly among the training institutes surveyed. Based on these findings, we expect to create better psychotherapy training programs for psychiatric residents.

Role of Stress in Functional Dyspepsia / 대한소화관운동학회지

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Pathogenesis of functional dyspepsia consists of motor abnormality, sensory abnormality, and psychologic abnormality. Anxiety, depression, and psychosomatic disorders are well known psychopathologies that lead to dyspepsia, and stress seems to be an additional etiology. The aim of this study is to assess whether stress can cause and/or provoke dyspepsia. METHODS: Functional dyspepsia was defined and classified by Rome criteria. SCL-90-R for the detection of psychopathology, measurement of life stress scale by self-administered questionnaire, and measurement of stress coping mechanisms using a multidimensional stress coping scale test were performed in 79 functional dyspeptic patients and 25 normal controls. RESULTS: No significant difference was found in the total amount of stress between functional dyspeptic patients and the normal control. However, the patients were more stressful about issues relating to health and marital relationship among stresses in individual daily life. As the patients become more stressful, they used more negative coping mechanisms such as restraint, fatalism, criticism, religiousness, and negativism. These seem to provoke several psychopathologies including interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility. However, there was no relationship in the amount of stress, the stress coping mechanism, and psychopathology among the dyspeptic symptoms and subgroups of functional dyspepsia. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the total amount of stress between functional dyspeptic patients and the normal control. In some individuals who utilize inadequate coping mechanisms against stress, the stress can provoke dyspepsia.

Role of Stress in Functional Dyspepsia / 대한소화관운동학회지

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Pathogenesis of functional dyspepsia consists of motor abnormality, sensory abnormality, and psychologic abnormality. Anxiety, depression, and psychosomatic disorders are well known psychopathologies that lead to dyspepsia, and stress seems to be an additional etiology. The aim of this study is to assess whether stress can cause and/or provoke dyspepsia. METHODS: Functional dyspepsia was defined and classified by Rome criteria. SCL-90-R for the detection of psychopathology, measurement of life stress scale by self-administered questionnaire, and measurement of stress coping mechanisms using a multidimensional stress coping scale test were performed in 79 functional dyspeptic patients and 25 normal controls. RESULTS: No significant difference was found in the total amount of stress between functional dyspeptic patients and the normal control. However, the patients were more stressful about issues relating to health and marital relationship among stresses in individual daily life. As the patients become more stressful, they used more negative coping mechanisms such as restraint, fatalism, criticism, religiousness, and negativism. These seem to provoke several psychopathologies including interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility. However, there was no relationship in the amount of stress, the stress coping mechanism, and psychopathology among the dyspeptic symptoms and subgroups of functional dyspepsia. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the total amount of stress between functional dyspeptic patients and the normal control. In some individuals who utilize inadequate coping mechanisms against stress, the stress can provoke dyspepsia.