ABSTRACT
Background/Aims@#Standard triple therapy (STT; proton pump inhibitor [PPI]+clarithromycin+amoxicillin) used for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication has shown low treatment success rates in recent years, which is most likely attributable to increased clarithromycin resistance. In this study, we compared treatment success rates of tailored therapy (TT) using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and empirical STT. @*Methods@#This retrospective study included 650 patients with H. pylori infection, who visited Eunpyeong St. Mary’s Hospital in Korea; 343 patients received TT based on RT-PCR assays, and 307 patients received STT. Eradication success was defined as a negative 13C-urea breath test result 4~8 weeks after treatment completion. Patients who failed first-line therapy and those with clarithromycin resistance received bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (BQT; PPI+bismuth+metronidazole+tetracycline). @*Results@#Intention-to-treat analysis showed that H. pylori eradication rates were higher in patients who received RT-PCR–based TT than in those who were treated using empirical STT (80.5% [190/236] vs. 70.4% [216/307], P=0.069). Per-protocol (PP) analysis showed similar results (84.4% [190/225] vs. 74.7% [216/289], P=0.007). PP analysis showed that 7-day TT treatment was associated with a higher eradication rate than that observed with 10- to 14-day STT (85.2% [178/209] vs. 73.8% [59/80], P=0.029). The clarithromycin resistance rate was 27.9% (87/312). The eradication success rate was 89.2% (74/83) in patients with clarithromycin resistance, who received BQT as first-line therapy. @*Conclusions@#The treatment success rate was higher in patients who received 7-day RT-PCR–based TT than in those who were administered 10- to 14-day empirical treatment.
ABSTRACT
The prevalence of small bowel cancer is relatively low. The abdominal pain that patients with small bowel cancer present as a symptom is non-specific and often interpreted as a normal finding on radiographic studies. To prevent delayed diagnosis of small bowel cancer, practitioners must maintain a certain level of suspicion. We report a case of delayed diagnosis of jejunal cancer as it was misdiagnosed as gastroparesis. A 69-year-old woman complained of recurrent nausea and vomiting. At the beginning of her hospitalization, we could not diagnose mechanical obstruction through esophagogastroduodenoscopy and abdominal computed tomography. A gastric emptying study revealed delayed gastric emptying. Although the patients received treatments, including administration of prokinetics and botulinum toxin injection, for gastroparesis, her symptoms aggravated. Subsequently, plain radiography of the abdomen revealed a double-bubble sign. Abdominal computed tomography was performed under the suspicion of small bowel obstruction; however, the diagnosis was not clear. Consequently, exploratory laparoscopy was performed. She underwent surgical management, including small bowel segmental resection and duodenojejunostomy, due to the jejunal mass with involvement of the stomach, pancreatic head, and mesentery of the transverse colon. The postoperative pathological results revealed a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma of the jejunum.