Surgical Treatment of Intercondylar Fracture of the distal Humerus through the Modified Triceps Sparing Approach / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: We evaluated the therapeutic results of intercondylar fractures of the distal humerus that were treated through the modified tricepssparing approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From February, 1997 to september, 2001, we reviewed sixteen cases of intercondylar fracture of the distal humerus, which were treated by surgical treatment. The follow up period ranged from one year to three years, averaging 1 year 8 months. The articularsurface of the distal humerus was exposed through elevation of the triceps from the medial and the lateral intermuscular septum. Theulna nerve was identified and protected, and then, the fracture sites were fixed with double plates. The functional results were evaluated using Broberg and Morrey's functional scale. RESULTS: All united at 14.5 weeks in an average. The functional results were as follows; three excellent, ten good, two fair and one poor. The range of the elbow joint motion was flexion contracture 11 degree to further flexion 130 degree in average. The one patient presented poor result had coronal shear fracture of the capitulum combined with severe comminution. The incomplete ulnar nerve palsy developed in one case. CONCLUSION: The modified triceps sparing approach provided sufficient exposure for rigid fixation of intercondylar fracture of the humerus. But in cases with severe comminution or coronal shear fracture, additional anterior approach or olecranon osteotomy should be considered.

Biomechanical Effect of Cyclic Loading on the Reconstructed Posterior Cruciate Ligament: Comparison between Inlay and Transtibial Technique / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: To compare differences in the biomechanical characteristics of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstructed by the inlay and transtibial techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PCL reconstruction was performed in 12 pairs of porcine hindlimbs using the inlay and transtibial techniques. Cyclic load testing was carried out in three steps. The first step was 750 cycles at 35-350 N, the second 10,000 cycles at 35-350 N, and the third 10,000 cycles at 45-450 N. Length changes of the reconstructed PCLs were measured and the sites of rupture observed. RESULTS: Among the 10 pairs of limbs that completed the test procedure, the graft ruptured before step 3 in all specimens except one in the transtibial group, and seven specimens completed step 3 testing in the inlay group. Comparing the load elongation curves obtained in step 2 tests, more elongation of the graft was evident in the transtibial group (p<0.05). The site of rupture was proximal 1/3 (2 specimens) or distal 1/3 (1) to the graft in the inlay group, and in the distal 1/3 for all specimens of the transtibial group. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the tibial tunnel orifice renders a risk of attritional rupture to the graft in the transtibial technique. In this respect, the inlay technique has a biomechanical advantage over the transtibial technique.