ABSTRACT
Fifty-six patients with a mean age of 58 years, 14 females and 42 males, all with dominant systolic heart failure (33 in functional class 3 and 4) were randomised to receive either added placebo or added enalapril to their heart failure medication. There were 13 patients in this group who had their trial drug switched after a certain period to allow direct but blind comparison between placebo and enalapril. Cardiac mortality with enalapril was 32 per cent compared to 48 per cent with placebo at intervals after initiating therapy of 20.0 +/- 19.4 versus 14.3 +/- 11.5 months respectively. When compared to a preceding control period, 80 per cent of the enalapril patients improved in contrast to 21 per cent of the placebo. However, when a comparison was made directly between enalapril and placebo, enalapril was better in 31 per cent and placebo was better in 8 per cent of the patients. It is concluded that in certain patients with systolic heart failure from non-valvular and non-hypertensive causes, enalapril is beneficial when added to the conventional treatment. An argument is also presented that to cost-effectively identify the group who will benefit, a short term ACE-I trial after the conventional antifailure therapy can be considered in all patients with systolic heart failure.