Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
IJRM-International Journal of Reproductive Biomedicine. 2018; 16 (7): 463-468
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-204989

ABSTRACT

Background: sperm processing methods separate motile sperms with good morphology from dead and abnormal forms of sperms, immature germ cells, and non-sperm cells


Objective: the propose of this study was to compare the efficacy of upstream and swim-up processing techniques to separate sperms with the high quality especially in relation to sperm chromatin integrity


Materials and Methods: this experimental study used semen samples from 60 normozoospermic men. Specimens were divided into equal aliquots for processing by swim up [group A], and upstream [group B] methods and compare with control by raw semen [group C]. Sperm concentration, morphology, motility, DNA fragmentation and chromatin maturation were measured in these three groups


Results: the results revealed that sperm concentration in the swim up samples was significantly greater than upstream samples [p/= 0.4]. In addition, sperm DNA fragmentation and chromatin maturation were not significantly different between the three groups [p >/= 0.1]


Conclusion: according to results, apparently the upstream method had no significant efficiency to separate good quality sperms compare to swim up. Therefore, swim up seems to be a simple, inexpensive, reliable and widely available method with an efficient yield to separate motile sperm with good morphology and better chromatin integrity for insemination in the infertility clinics

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL