Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
JCPSP-Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan. 2016; 26 (7): 577-580
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-182349

ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine the frequency and antibiogram of pathogens in an Intensive care unit [ICU]


Study Design: Cross-sectional, observational study


Place and Duration of Study: Department of Microbiology, Army Medical College, National University of Science and Technology, Islamabad, from January 2013 to January 2014


Methodology: Clinical samples, received from patients admitted in ICU, were inoculated on various medias like blood agar, chocolate agar, MacConkey agar and urine samples on CLED. These were then incubated at 37°C for 24 hours


Isolates were identified by colony morphology, Gram reaction, catalase test, oxidase test. Species identification in case of Gram Negative Rods was done by using API 20E [BioMerieux]. Antibiotic susceptibility was done by using modified Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion technique. Bacterial isolates were prepared and inoculated on Mueller-Hinton agar plates followed by application of various antibiotic disc [Oxoid, UK] as per manufacturer's instructions. The plates were then incubated at 37°C aerobically for 18 - 24 hours. Zone diameters were measured and interpreted as sensitive and resistant, according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [CLSI] guidelines


Results: Out of the 367 positive cultures, 116 [31.08%] were Acinetobacter baumannii susceptible to minocycline and tigecycline followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae [n=71, 16%] susceptible to tigecycline and meropenem. Others were Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coll, Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus spp., Streptococcus spp., Klebsiella oxytoca, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Candida spp


Conclusion: Acinetobacter baumannii was the most frequently isolated pathogen. Most of the cultures yielding pathogens were from respiratory tract samples. Gram negative isolates were multidrug resistant but most were tigecycline and susceptible to meropenem

2.
JCPSP-Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan. 2015; 25 (4): 247-249
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-191591

ABSTRACT

Objective: To compare the in vitro antimicrobial efficacy of ceftaroline with linezolid against Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Microbiology Department, Army Medical College, Rawalpindi, from January to December 2013. Methodology: Clinical samples from respiratory tract, blood, pus and various catheter tips routinely received in the Department of Microbiology, Army Medical College, Rawalpindi were innoculated on blood and MacConkey agar. Staphylococcus aureus was identified by colony morphology, Gram reaction, catalase test and coagulase test. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus detection was done by modified Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method using cefoxitin disc [30microg] and the isolates were considered methicillin resistant if the zone of inhibition around cefoxitin disc was = 21 mm. Bacterial suspensions of 56 Staphylococcus aureus isolates and 50 MRSA isolates were prepared, which were st and ardized equal to 0.5 McFarl and 's turbidity st and ard and inoculated on Mueller-Hinton agar plates followed by application of ceftaroline and linezolid disc [Oxoid, UK], according to manufacturer's instructions. The plates were then incubated at 37°C aerobically for 18 - 24 hours. Diameters of inhibition zone were measured and interpretated as per Clinical and Laboratory St and ards Institute [CLSI] guidelines. Results: Out of 106 isolates all of the 56 Staphylococcus aureus [100%] were sensitive to ceftaroline and linezolid. However, out of 50 methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 48 [96%] were sensitive to ceftaroline whereas, 49 [98%] were sensitive to linezolid. Conclusion: Ceftaroline is equally effective as linezolid against Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Key Words: Ceftaroline. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Linezolid.

3.
JCPSP-Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan. 2015; 25 (2): 108-110
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-162306

ABSTRACT

To determine the sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value [PPV] and Negative Predictive Value [NPV] of Urine Nitrite [NIT] and Leukocyte Esterase [LE] test compared with urine culture for diagnosis of UTI. Validation study. Department of Microbiology, Army Medical College, Rawalpindi, from January 2013 to December 2013. Three hundred fresh uncentrifuged urine samples with suspicion of UTI, were collected and tested for LE and NIT by using [COMBI-10SL, UK] strip. Nitrite was considered as positive if there was a change in color of dipstick from colorless towards pink within 60 seconds. Leukocyte esterase was considered as positive if there was a change in color from off-white towards purple within 2 minutes. Quantitative urine culture was performed by using the strips calibrated to deliver 0.02 ul of urine on Cystine Lactose Electrolyte Deficient [CLED] medium agar. All plates were incubated at 37°C and read after 24 and 48 hours. Culture was considered as gold standard to evaluate the performance of dipstick test. Out of 300 samples, 136 were culture positive and 164 were culture negative. Out of 136 positive culture results, 103 were dipstick positive and 33 were negative. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of both nitrite and leukocyte esterase were 75.74%, 68.90%, 66.66% and 77.40% respectively considering culture as gold standard. Dipstick test for the detection of leukocyte esterase and nitrite in urine are sensitive and specific and can be used reliably for the detection of UTI in resource limited setup

4.
JCPSP-Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan. 2015; 25 (10): 726-729
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-173265

ABSTRACT

Objective: To assess the in vitro efficacy of doripenem against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii using Epsilometer strips


Study Design: Cross-sectional study


Place and Duration of Study: Department of Microbiology, Army Medical College, Rawalpindi and National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, from May 2014 to September 2014


Methodology: A total of 60 isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected from various clinical samples received from Military Hospital were included in the study. The specimens were inoculated onto blood, MacConkey and chocolate agars. The isolates were identified using Gram staining, motility, catalase test, oxidase test and API 20NE [Biomeriux, France]. Organisms identified as Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were included in the study. Bacterial suspensions equivalent to 0.5 McFarland turbidity standard of the isolates were prepared and applied on Mueller Hinton agar. Epsilometer strip was placed in the center of the plate and incubated for 18-24 hours. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration [MIC] was taken to be the point where the epsilon intersected the E-strip. MIC of all the isolates was noted


Results: For Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates, MIC[50] was 12 [micro]g/mL and MIC[90] was 32 [micro]g/mL. For Acinetobacter baumannii MIC[50] and MIC[90] was 32 [micro]g/mL


Conclusion: Doripenem is no more effective against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii in our setting

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL