Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 51(9): e7394, 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-951756

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to compare muscle strength in male subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) with and without low plasma testosterone levels and assess the relationship between muscle strength, testosterone levels, and proinflammatory cytokines. Males (75) aged between 18 and 65 years were divided into 3 groups: control group that did not have diabetes and had a normal testosterone plasma level (>250 ng/dL), DnormalTT group that had DM2 with normal testosterone levels, and the DlowTT group that had DM2 and low plasma testosterone levels (<250 ng/dL). The age (means±SD) of the groups was 48.4±10, 52.6±7, and 54.6±7 years, respectively. Isokinetic concentric and isometric torque of knee flexors and extensors were analyzed by an isokinetic dynamometer. Plasma testosterone and proinflammatory cytokine levels were determined by chemiluminescence and ELISA, respectively. Glycemic control was analyzed by glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C). In general, concentric and isometric torques were lower and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-6, and IL-1β plasma levels were higher in the groups with diabetes than in controls. There was no correlation between testosterone level and knee torques or proinflammatory cytokines. Concentric and isometric knee flexion and extension torque were negatively correlated with TNF-α, IL-6, and HbA1C. IL-6 and TNF-α were positively correlated with HbA1C. The results of this study demonstrated that muscle strength was not associated with testosterone levels in men with DM2. Low muscle strength was associated with inflammatory markers and poor glycemic control.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Young Adult , Testosterone/blood , Cytokines/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/physiopathology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood , Muscle Strength/physiology , Interleukin-6/blood , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/blood , Inflammation Mediators/blood , Torque , Isometric Contraction/physiology , Knee
2.
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 45(9): 806-810, Sept. 2012. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-646325

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of image resolution manipulation on the photogrammetric measurement of the rearfoot static angle. The study design was that of a reliability study. We evaluated 19 healthy young adults (11 females and 8 males). The photographs were taken at 1536 pixels in the greatest dimension, resized into four different resolutions (1200, 768, 600, 384 pixels) and analyzed by three equally trained examiners on a 96-pixels per inch (ppi) screen. An experienced physiotherapist marked the anatomic landmarks of rearfoot static angles on two occasions within a 1-week interval. Three different examiners had marked angles on digital pictures. The systematic error and the smallest detectable difference were calculated from the angle values between the image resolutions and times of evaluation. Different resolutions were compared by analysis of variance. Inter- and intra-examiner reliability was calculated by intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). The rearfoot static angles obtained by the examiners in each resolution were not different (P > 0.05); however, the higher the image resolution the better the inter-examiner reliability. The intra-examiner reliability (within a 1-week interval) was considered to be unacceptable for all image resolutions (ICC range: 0.08-0.52). The whole body image of an adult with a minimum size of 768 pixels analyzed on a 96-ppi screen can provide very good inter-examiner reliability for photogrammetric measurements of rearfoot static angles (ICC range: 0.85-0.92), although the intra-examiner reliability within each resolution was not acceptable. Therefore, this method is not a proper tool for follow-up evaluations of patients within a therapeutic protocol.


Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Foot/anatomy & histology , Foot/physiology , Observer Variation , Photogrammetry , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results
3.
Braz. j. phys. ther. (Impr.) ; 11(1): 27-33, jan.-fev. 2007. graf, tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-446081

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVOS: Identificar déficits sensório-motores de pés de pacientes diabéticos neuropatas e comparar os déficits do grupo neuropata com um grupo de sujeitos saudáveis. MÉTODO: 49 diabéticos neuropatas (GD) e 22 controles foram submetidos a um protocolo de três estágios: (1) entrevista por meio de questionário, que caracterizou a neuropatia e sintomas, (2) avaliação da função muscular, amplitude de movimentos e testes funcionais dos pés e tornozelos, (3) avaliação da sensibilidade tátil e térmica. Os grupos foram comparados por meio dos testes Qui-quadrado, Mann-Withney e Teste T (p<0,05). RESULTADOS: O GD mostrou perda significativa das sensibilidades tátil e térmica em comparação ao grupo controle, principalmente nos calcanhares (49,0 por cento no GD e 97,3 por cento no GC). A função muscular está diminuída no GD, com predomínio da perda do grau 5. Os músculos mais afetados são os interósseos (23,4 por cento), extensor do hálux (42,5 por cento) e tríceps sural (43,2 por cento), enquanto que o GC teve todos os músculos preservados. Todas as ADMs do GD estão diminuídas em relação ao GC. O GD apresentou os testes funcionais de tornozelo diminuídos em 50 por cento. CONCLUSÃO: Houve diferenças significativas entre os grupos quanto às perdas sensitivas, de função muscular, amplitude de movimento e funcionais. Essas diferenças podem ser atribuídas à neuropatia diabética.


OBJECTIVE: To identify motor sensory deficits in the feet of neuropathic diabetic patients and compare their deficits with a group of healthy subjects. METHOD: 49 neuropathic diabetics (group NG) and 22 controls (group CG) underwent a three-stage protocol: (1) an interview using a questionnaire to characterize the neuropathy and symptoms; (2) assessment of muscle function and range of motion, and functional tests on the feet and ankles; (3) assessment of tactile and thermal sensitivity. The groups were compared using the chi-squared, Mann-Whitney and Student t tests (p<0.05). RESULTS: NG presented significant losses of tactile and thermal sensitivity in comparison with CG, especially in the heels (49.0 percent of NG and 97.3 percent of CG). Muscle function was decreased in NG, with predominance of loss of grade 5. The muscles most affected were the interossei (23.4 percent), extensor hallucis (42.5 percent) and triceps surae (43.2 percent), while all muscle function was preserved in CG. All ranges of motion in NG were reduced in comparison with CG. The functional tests on the ankles in NG presented a decrease of around 50 percent. CONCLUSION: There were significant differences between the groups with regard to sensitivity, muscle function, range of motion and functional losses. These differences can be attributed to the diabetic neuropathy.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Neuropathies , Physical Therapy Modalities
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL