Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Tunisie Medicale [La]. 2015; 93 (7): 454-457
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-177376

ABSTRACT

Background: Haematemesis is an alarming symptom in children, even if the proportion of normal endoscopies ranges from 10 to 21% and the causes are often benign. The purpose of the study was to identify clinical predictors of endoscopic lesions with high risk of bleeding and to establish a score that predict the presence of these lesions


Methods:Retrospective study carried in Children's Hospital of Tunis between 1997 and 2006 involved children with haematemesis who underwent Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Several clinical parameters were analyzed. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed to identify predictive parameters of endoscopic lesions with high risk of bleeding. A score was developed from the parameters derived from the multivariate analysis. The sensitivity and specificity of the score were determined


Results: Among 2814 endoscopies, 814 were conducted for haematemesis and 489 were selected for the study. 140/489 had lesions with high risk of bleeding. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified six factors independently associated with high risk bleeding lesions: endoscopy performed within 48 hours [OR=2.2; 95% CI 0.7-6.9], re-bleeding [OR=1.4; 95% CI 0.7-2.5], the importance of the bleeding, mild to severe [OR=1.8; 95% CI 1.1- 3], bright red haematemesis [OR=1; 95% CI 0.2-5.8], history of gastrointestinal and liver disease [OR=1.6; 95% CI 1.1-3] and intake of gastro toxic drugs [OR=1.3; 95% CI 0.8-2.3]. Then, we established a score. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of this score were respectively 79.6%, 32.9%, 34.9% and 78% for a cut off value> 0.22


Conclusion: The clinical predictive parameters of high risk bleeding lesions identified have not yielded a score with significant sensitivity and specificity. A prospective study should be performed to improve the score

2.
Tunisie Medicale [La]. 2013; 91 (11): 655-660
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-141184

ABSTRACT

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy [EGD] is currently considered the first line diagnostic procedure chosen for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding [UGIB] since 1970. However, studies are still limited in our country. Finding out the most common causes of UGIB in children and whether the causes differed according to age in developing and developed countries. A retrospective review of the medical records of children referred to the Paediatric Gastroenterology Department of The Tunis Hospital of Children between January 1998 and December 2006 for upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The children were divided into three groups; G1: neonates; G2: infants; G 3: children and adolescents. The study involved 614 endoscopies. The aetiology was not ascertained in 20.68%of cases. G1 included 125 newborns: 24 with no identified causes, 97 mucosal lesions [isolated or associated]; two ulcers and two tumours. G2 and G3 included respectively 205 infants and 289 children. Toxic drug intake was recorded in 140 out of 489 patients. Endoscopy was normal in 101 cases. Peptic oesophagitis was recorded in 57/205 [27.8%] of G2 infants versus 52/284 [10%] of G3 children [p=0.015]. Gastritis was recorded in 164/284 [55.6%] of G2 infants versus 86/205 [41.9%] of G3 children [p

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL