ABSTRACT
Aims and Objectives: The aims were to compare the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE)‑II system against three established risk scoring systems for predictive accuracy in an urban Indian population and suggest improvements or amendments in the existing scoring system for adaptation in Indian population. Materials and Methods: EuroSCORE‑II, Parsonnet score, System‑97 score, and Cleveland score were obtained preoperatively for 1098 consecutive patients. EuroSCORE‑II system was analyzed in comparison to each of the above three scoring systems in an urban Indian population. Calibrations of scoring systems were assessed using Hosmer–Lemeshow test. Areas under receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were compared according to the statistical approach suggested by Hanley and McNeil. Results: All EuroSCORE‑II subgroups had highly significant P values stating good predictive mortality, except high‑risk group (P = 0.175). The analysis of ROC curves of different scoring systems showed that the highest predictive value for mortality was calculated for the System‑97 score followed by the Cleveland score. System‑97 revealed extremely high predictive accuracies across all subgroups (curve area >80%). This difference in predictive accuracy was found to be statistically significant (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The present study suggests that the EuroSCORE‑II model in its present form is not validated for use in the Indian population. An interesting observation was significantly accurate predictive abilities of the System‑97 score
Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures/mortality , Humans , India , Population Groups , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Assessment/standards , Risk Factors , Models, Statistical , Urban PopulationABSTRACT
Patients with acute aortic dissection present with such varied symptoms that diagnosis becomes difficult. Various imaging techniques like computed tomography angiography (CTA), magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography are used to diagnose this entity, but they too have their limitations. We present a case, which was falsely diagnosed as acute aortic dissection by CTA, which resulted in patient undergoing sternotomy.
Subject(s)
Acute Disease , Aortic Dissection/diagnosis , Angiography , Aortic Aneurysm/diagnosis , Echocardiography, Transesophageal , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sternotomy , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is widely used in cardiac surgery. TEE provides important diagnostic and functional information before and after cardiopulmonary bypass thereby having a very important impact on perioperative clinical outcomes. We describe a case in which intraoperative TEE was instrumental in the timely diagnosis of inadvertant closure of the inferior vena cava (IVC) opening during minimally invasive surgical closure of atrial septal defect.