Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Braz. j. morphol. sci ; 23(3/4): 333-342, July-Dec. 2006. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-644235

ABSTRACT

This article describes the use of geometric measurements of continuous, discrete parameters to studymorphometric variation in the wing cells of two sibling species, Drosophila mercatorum and Drosophilaparanaensis. To validate the results, the same wing samples were also analyzed using truss networks andpartial warps, in addition to a comparison with the ellipse method. The use of discriminative measurementsin conjunction with a Bayesian-based classification method yielded a relatively high number of correctclassifications for new individuals. These results compared favorably with those obtained using trussnetworks, partial warps and the ellipse method. These findings indicate that continuous curvature and arclength measurements may be useful parameters for the morphometric analysis of insect wings and possiblyother biological structures and shapes.


Subject(s)
Animals , Body Weights and Measures , Drosophila , Drosophila/anatomy & histology , Wings, Animal/anatomy & histology , Wings, Animal/physiology , Insecta
2.
Genet. mol. biol ; 27(4): 561-566, Dec. 2004. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-391230

ABSTRACT

The analysis of polytene chromosomes in 26 strains of seven species in the Drosophila fasciola subgroup, from several locations in Brazil, in addition to strains of two species belonging to the Drosophila mulleri subgroup (D. aldrichi and D. mulleri), enabled us to determine that the 3c inversion found in the latter species differ in one of its break points from that present in the species of the fasciola subgroup. Therefore, a change in the mulleri complex denomination from inversion 3c to inversion 3u is proposed. Accordingly, the fasciola subgroup is no longer a lesser phylogenetic part within the mulleri subgroup. Rather, it is directly related to the likely ancestor of the repleta group, called Primitive I. This information removes the main obstacle to considering the Drosophila fasciola subgroup as an ancestral group within the Drosophila repleta species group, according to the hypothesis of Throckmorton. Our data also support the conclusion that D. onca and D. carolinae are closely related species based on one new inversion in chromosome 4 (4f²), in both species. D. fascioloides and D. ellisoni also form a pair of sister species based on the presence of fusions of chromosomes 2-4 and 3-5. D. rosinae is related only to the likely ancestor of the fasciola subgroup, where the 3c inversion was fixed.


Subject(s)
Animals , Chromosome Inversion , Drosophila , Phylogeny
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL