The clinical effects of body mass index in patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention / 대한내과학회지

BACKGROUND: Obesity is one of the major risk factors for coronary artery disease. However, the long-term clinical effects of obesity after percutaneus coronary intervention (PCI) in Korean patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have not been sufficiently evaluated. METHODS: A total of 309 patients (mean age 60.5+/-11.3 years, M:F=243:66) that underwent PCI with a diagnosis of AMI between February 2002 and June 2006. Thepatients were divided into two groups according to the body mass index (BMI): group I (n=194; BMI or =25 kg/m2, mean age 58.2+/-11.3 years, M:F=92:23). Clinical characteristics and risk factors, and major adverse cardiac events during a six-month follow-up were compared between patients in the two gropus. RESULTS: The mean age of group I patients was older than that of group II patients (61.7+/-11.1 years vs. 58.6+/-11.5 years, p=0.017). The prevalence of hypertension was higher in group II patients (75/194, 38.7% vs.59/115, 51.3%, p=0.033) and hyperlipidemia was more prevalent in group II patients (75/194, 38.7% vs. 60/115, 52.2%, p=0.024). The levels of total cholesterol (184.3+/-39.9 mg/dL vs. 201.4+/-42.6 mg/dL, p=0.001), triglycerides (121.2+/-61.6 mg/dL vs. 147.1+/-96.2 mg/dL, p=0.005), low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (120.3+/-35.1 mg/dL vs. 134.1+/-37.8 mg/dL, p=0.002) were lower in group I patients than in group II patients. The restenosis rate on a follow-up coronary angiogram was higher in group II patients (18/69, 26.1%) than in group I patients (14/109, 12.8%, p=0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Obesity is associated with hyperlipidemia and hypertension in patients with AMI. The restenosis rate after PCI was higher in obese AMI patients.

Predictive Factors after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Young Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at a young age less than 40 years is an uncommon condition and it is characterized by multiple cardiovascular risk factors. We analyzed the risk factors of restenosis in AMI patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and these patients were under the age of 40 years. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Between January 1997 and December 2006, 88 out of the 121 young AMI patients (mean age: 35.6+/-4.0 years, 115 males) who underwent follow-up coronary angiography after PCI were divided into two groups: the patients without restenosis (group I: n=62, mean age: 35.6+/-3.9 years, 60 males) and the patients with restenosis (group II: n=26, mean age: 36.3+/-3.8 years, 23 males). The clinical and coronary angiographic characteristics were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Smoking (79.3%) was the most common risk factor in all the patients. The baseline clinical characteristics and baseline laboratory findings were not different between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the sex ratio (p=0.124). The Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flows were not different between the two groups. The level of homocysteine (hcy) was significantly decreased from 12.4+/-8.8 micronmol/L to 9.3+/-3.8 micronmol/L in group I (p=0.011), but this was not changed significantly in group II (p=0.062). According to multiple logistic regression analysis, a high triglyceride level (>200 mg/dL) was an independent predictor of restenosis (p=0.046). CONCLUSION: A high level of serum triglyceride is a predictive factor of restenosis after PCI in young age patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Predictive factor of the third coronary stent restenosis / 대한내과학회지

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been established as one of the effective therapeutic methods in the treatment of ischemic heart disease. A coronary artery stent is the most promising device in PCI, however in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a major problem to be overcome. METHODS: Follow-up coronary angiograms (CAG) three times after stenting were performed in 107 out of 3,816 stented patients at Chonnam National University Hospital between August 1992 and July 2004. The patients were divided into four groups: forty eight patients (Group I: 58.7+/-9.5 years, 35 Males) had no incident ISR on three follow-up CAG. Fourteen patients had three times of ISR and underwent four PCIs (Group II : 54.5+/-9.51 years, 12 Males), 15 had two times of ISR and underwent three PCIs (Group III : 53.9+/-5.9 years, 11 males), 30 had one time of ISR and underwent two PCIs (Group IV : 59.6+/-9.5 years, 27 males). Each group was analysed according to clinical characteristics, coronary angiographic findings, and therapeutic modalities for ISR. RESULTS: There was no differences in clinical diagnosis, lesion location, multi-vessel lesion and TIMI flow. Risk factors for atherosclerosis were not different except for diabetes mellitus. The incidence of diabetes mellitus was more common in Group II than in Group I (Group I: 22%, Group II: 57%, Group III: 46%, Group IV: 20%, Group I vs. Group II: p =0.023). Stent length and diameter were not different among four groups. CONCLUSION: The only predictor of recurrent coronary stent restenosis more than three times is diabetes mellitus.

The Clinical Experience of Recannulation of Femoral Artery Following Initial Angioseal(r) Use after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The impact for recannulation of an artery, where a vascular closure device had been used following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), has not been evaluated. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and safety of recannulation of the femoral artery following the use of an Angioseal(r) following PCI. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Between February 2002 and June 2004, 110 patients (Group I: 60.0+/-9.0 years, 84 male), who underwent a 6-month follow-up coronary angiography (CAG) following PCI and the use of an Angioseal(r) closure device, were compared with a further 110 randomly assigned patients (Group II: 61.4+/-9.2 years, 78 male), who received manual compression for femoral artery hemostasis following PCI during the same period. The occurrence of femoral puncture site complications, the time to active ambulation following PCI and procedural difficulties for recannulation during the follow-up CAG were analyzed. RESULTS: The baseline clinical characteristics and procedure related factors were similar between the two groups. No major complications were noted in either group. There were no differences in the incidence of minor complications, including puncture site oozing or hematoma, between the two groups. The time to active ambulation was significantly shorter in group I than II (7.2+/-2.7 vs. 17.3+/-4.2 hours, p=0.001). At the 6-month follow-up CAG, no major complications associated with re-puncture at the same site of the femoral artery were noted, and there were no differences in the incidence of minor complications between the two groups. CONCLUSION: An Angioseal(r) was a convenient method of hemostasis, which promoted early ambulation without difficulties in the reuse of the femoral artery.

Predictive Factors for the Mortality of Cardiovascular Patients at Coronary Care Unit / 대한구급학회지

BACKGROUND: Recently the incidence of coronary artery disease has been increased rapidly in Korea. After the introduction of coronary care unit, the mortality rate of cardiovascular patients has been decreased. The predictive factors for mortality in patients admitted at Coronary Care Unit (CCU) are important in the management of acutely ill cardiovascular patients. METHODS: One thousand one hundred and thirty patients (64.8+/-14.5 years), who were admitted at CCU from January 2002 to June 2003, were analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups according to mortality: the survived group (Group I: n=1055, 63.3+/-13.3 years) and the moribund group (Group II: n=75, 64.8+/-14.1 years). Clinical characteristics, risk factors, clinical diagnosis, laboratory, echocardiographic and coronary angiographic findings were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The overall mortality at CCU was 6.6%, 75 out of 1130 patients. Age and sex were not different between both groups. Coronary artery disease was the most common cause of admission (886 out of 1130 patients) and death (46 out of 75 patients). Coronary angiographic findings were not different between the two groups. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by echocardiogram was higher in Group I than in Group II (53.1+/-15.6% vs. 42.3+/-16.3%, p<0.05). Predictive factors for mortality by multiple logistic regression analysis were low LVEF (OR 11.4, 2.9-21.4 95%CI, p<0.001), no performance of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI, OR 10.8, 2.5-17.8 95%CI, p<0.001) and clinical diagnosis of aortic dissection (OR 3.8, 1.3-9.8 95%CI, p=0.021). CONCLUSIONS: The predictive factors for mortality at CCU were low LVEF, no PCI and aortic dissection.

The Long-Term Clinical Results of a Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Blocker (Abciximab : ReoPro(R)) Coated Stent in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The inhibition of coronary restenosis with an Abciximab (ReoPro(R))-coated stent has previously been reported by us. This study investigated the clinical outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated with ReoPro-coated stents. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: A prospective randomized trial was conducted to compare two types of stent for the revascularization in 63 patients [Group I (ReoPro(r)-coated stent):n=32, 53.7+/-11.8 years, 27 male, and Group II (control stent):n=31, 55.4+/-12.1 years, 27 male] with AMI. The primary effective end points were major adverse coronary events (MACE):cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization (TLR), in-stent restenosis and late lumen loss at the 1 year clinical and angiographic follow-ups. RESULTS: Baseline clinical characteristics and diameters of stenosis and the minimal luminal diameters were no different between the two groups. There was one myocardial infarction and revascularization during the hospital stay in group II. Follow-up coronary angiograms were performed in 71.9 (23/32) and 77.4% (24/31) of groups I and II, respectively. The diameter of stenosis and late loss were significantly lower in group I than group II (19.4+/-5.1 vs. 34.8+/-5.9%, p=0.013;and 0.39+/-0.26 vs. 0.89+/-0.45 mm;p=0.008, respectively). However, the restenosis rates were no different between the two groups (21.7 vs. 37.5%, p=0.341). One year clinical follow-ups were possible in 98.4% (62/63), and there were two AMI found in group II, but none in group I. The TLR rates and total MACE of group I were relatively lower compared with group II [12.9 (4/31) vs. 29.0% (9/31);p=0.122 and 12.9 (4/31) vs. 35.5% (11/31), p=0.038, respectively]. CONCLUSION: The ReoPro(R)-coated stent was safe, with no stent thrombosis, and effective in patients with AMI.