ABSTRACT
Adverse transfusion reactions (ATRs) are unexpected reactions to transfusion. This study examined the frequency, types of ATRs, and related blood products retrospectively in pediatric patients with less information than in adult patients. Four hundred and forty transfusions were performed for two months at a children’s hospital: 247 units of red blood cell (RBC) products, 142 units of platelet products, and 41 units of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) were used.Five adverse reactions occurred in five patients, three cases were allergic reactions, and two were febrile nonhemolytic reactions. The frequency was 1.13%, and apheresis platelets and leukocyte-reduced RBC were transfused. Two patients’ ATRs were found in the previous transfusions, and ATRs were repeated in subsequent transfusions in one patient. One of the ATRs was not reported to the blood bank and was then discovered during the study. Because pediatric patients may have limitations in recognizing or expressing their symptoms compared to adults, medical staff rely solely on vital signs and laboratory results rather than symptoms, causing difficulty in noticing ATRs. Information on ATRs and education on appropriate blood products will improve awareness of ATRs and blood management among medical staff at transfusion sites and blood banks.
ABSTRACT
Background@#An increasing number of blood banks use an automated analyzer in ABO blood typing to reduce the high workload and impact of human error. On the other hand, the automated system often causes ABO discrepancies, where cell and serum typing do not match. Hence, the manual method is used for confirmation.This study evaluated the appropriateness of retesting with the manual method. In addition, the causes of ABO discrepancies were analyzed. @*Methods@#A total of 77,590 blood samples were tested with the AutoVue Innova for ABO typing. Among them, 1280 samples were retested manually due to ABO discrepancies. The causes of the discrepancies were analyzed further through additional tests. The serum reaction grades in both methods were compared. @*Results@#ABO typing of 76,906 samples (99.12%), which included 596 manually confirmed samples could be confirmed by the AutoVue system, while 403 samples (0.52%) continued to yield discrepant results. Weak serum reactions in the AutoVue system were observed, as previously reported. One hundred and thirty samples (66.7%), which were graded 0.5+ in the automated analyzer, yielded a negative serum reaction in the manual method, showing a greater serum reaction with the AutoVue system than with the manual method. @*Conclusion@#The AutoVue Innova performs reliably for blood typing. On the other hand, the manual method is still useful as retesting to address the ABO discrepancies and weak or strong serum reactions. In particular, it is important to confirm samples with 0.5+ grade serum reactions manually.