Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics ; : 517-534, 1997.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-191465

ABSTRACT

It has been held that excessive mechanical forces to the osseous and soft tissues of the TMJ result in joint dysfunction. Understanding the stress pattern on TMJ is very important in TMJ research. But, it is very difficult to measure directly the biomechanical stress distribution in the TMJ during functional movement was studied through animal experiment or mathematical model . It was observed and compared the stress distribution occuring in the working and balancing condyle when lower right canine, lower right first molar and lower right second molar were clenched by the three dimensional finite element analysis. Also, stress distribution in the working and balancing condyles were observed and compared when 20 forward and buccal bite forces were applied to the first molar The results were as follows : 1. Stress distribution in the condyles during unilateral clenching of the first molar, second molar, canine showed no difference. In the working condyle, tensile force was concentrated on the lateral aspect of the condylar articular surface and condylar neck. And compressive force was concentrated on the anteromedial and lateral aspect of condyle. In the balancing condyle, tensile and compressive force was concentrated on the lateral aspect of the condylar articular surface and stress transmission to the temporal bone was not observed. 2. When lateral force were applied to the first molar, tensile force were concentrated on the medial aspect of the condylar neck and condylar posterior surface in working and balancing condyle. Compressive force was concentrated on the anteromedial and lateral surface of condyle and stress transmission to the temporal bone was not observed. 3. During unilateral clenching, stress in the working condyle decreased as the occlusal load moved posteriorly while the stress in the balancing condyle increased when lateral forces were applied to the first molar, the incremental amount of stress was greater than vertical load. 4. During unilateral clenching, the average balancing/ working stress ratio was 2.52. There was a greater concentration of stress in the balancing condyle. The ratio increased at the occlusal load moved posteriorly and decreased considerably when lateral forces were applied to the first molar


Subject(s)
Animal Experimentation , Bite Force , Finite Element Analysis , Joints , Mandibular Condyle , Models, Theoretical , Molar , Neck , Temporal Bone , Temporomandibular Joint
2.
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics ; : 557-565, 1997.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-191462

ABSTRACT

Screw-shaped implants of commercially pure (c.p.) titanium, c.p. niobium, c.p. zirconium, and stainless(Sus 304) were inserted in the rabbit tibial over 12 weeks of follow-up. New developed torque gauge instrument was used to evaluate the implant holding power and a image analysis program coupled to a microscope was used for histomorphometry. The three best consecutive threads of each implant were measured. Quantitative analyses at 12 weeks revealed a partial bone contact to the four kinds investigated metals. There were no obvious adverse tissue reactions to any of the biomaterials. At 12 weeks the average removal torques for titanium, niobium and zirconium were better than that needed for Sus 304 screws, on the other hand high score of bony contact ratio of titanium and niobium were showed in comparison to those of zirconium and Sus 304. There was no significant differences in the amount of interfacial bone of zirconium and Sus 304 whereas there was significant differences in the torque forces of niobium and Sus 304. Three months after implant insertion, the average removal torque was 6.64 Ncm for the titanium, 6.57 Ncm for the niobium, 6.38 Ncm for the zirconium, and 4.25 Ncm for the Sus 304. On average bone contacts there were 51.24% in the titanium, 48.19% in the niobium, 31.79% in the zirconium, 23.54% in Sus 304. Biocompatibility of the titanium, niobium and zirconium was acceptable level in comparison to the Sus 304.


Subject(s)
Biocompatible Materials , Follow-Up Studies , Hand , Metals , Niobium , Titanium , Torque , Zirconium
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL