Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
J Postgrad Med ; 2008 Oct-Dec; 54(4): 252-8
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-115924

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In developing countries, gender-based treatment disparities in cardiovascular preventive therapy have received little attention. AIMS: To evaluate the gender-based differences in cardiovascular disease risk profile, drug prescribing pattern, and blood pressure (BP) and glycemic control rates in diabetic hypertensives treated at primary care setting in Bahrain. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A retrospective study at primary care setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An audit of the medical records of 392 diabetic hypertensives (127 men, 265 women). RESULTS: BP and glycemic targets were achieved in < 10% and < 13% of diabetic hypertensives, respectively. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors monotherapy was more often prescribed in males. Apart from this, no significant differences in prescribing pattern were observed between male and female diabetic hypertensives treated with either antihypertensive mono or multidrug therapies. With the exception of insulin which was more often prescribed to females, a similar prescribing pattern and rank order of antidiabetics, either as monotherapy or combinations, was observed in both genders. The majority of diabetic hypertensives were at high cardiovascular risk. The body mass index and total cholesterol level were greater in females. Prescribing lipid-lowering drugs and aspirin were suboptimal; aspirin was more often prescribed to males. There was no gender-based difference with regard to the use of lipid-lowering drugs. CONCLUSIONS: BP and glycemic controls were suboptimal in both male and female diabetic hypertensives treated by primary care physicians. Cardiovascular disease preventive strategies have received little attention regardless of gender or other risk factors. Gender-based treatment inequities also need to be addressed.


Subject(s)
Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Bahrain/epidemiology , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Diabetic Angiopathies/drug therapy , Drug Prescriptions , Female , Health Status Disparities , Healthcare Disparities , Humans , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Primary Health Care , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Postgrad Med ; 2002 Jul-Sep; 48(3): 172-5
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-115536

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The issue of cardiovascular safety of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) has been widely debated in view of reflex increase in sympathetic activity induced by immediate release (IR) / short acting formulations. It is generally agreed that such CCBs should not be used alone in the management of hypertension. AIMS: We have determined the extent to which primary care physicians prescribe CCBs as monotherapy, especially the immediate release formulations, in the management of uncomplicated hypertension and diabetic hypertension - with an emphasis upon the age of the patients. SETTING, DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective prescription-based study was carried out in seven out of 18 Health Centres in Bahrain. The study involved a registered population of 229,300 representing 46% of registered individuals, and 35 physicians representing 43% of all primary care physicians. The data was collected between November 1998 and January 1999 using chronic dispensing cards. RESULTS: In all categories CCBs were the third commonly prescribed antihypertensive as monotherapy, with a prescription rate of 11.1% in uncomplicated hypertension, 18% in diabetic hypertension and 20.1% in elderly patients above 65 years of age. Nifedipine formulations were the most extensively prescribed CCBs. Almost half of the CCB-treated patients were on IR-nifedipine, whereas IR-diltiazem and IR-verapamil, and amlodipine were infrequently prescribed. CONCLUSION: Prescription of IR-formulations of CCBs as monotherapy by primary care physicians does not conform with recommended guidelines. In view of concerns about the safety of such practice, measures to change the prescribing pattern are required.


Subject(s)
Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antihypertensive Agents/administration & dosage , Bahrain , Calcium Channel Blockers/administration & dosage , Chemistry, Pharmaceutical , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Utilization Review , Female , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Hypertension/drug therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Primary Health Care/standards , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Postgrad Med ; 2001 Jan-Mar; 47(1): 55-61
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-116717

ABSTRACT

Panic Disorder and agoraphobia offer considerable diagnostic and management challenges, particularly in general practice. We describe a typical case of panic disorder in a young adult. The recent advances in our understanding of brain functions can be used to explain to a certain extent the biologic basis of panic disorder. A hypothetical model integrating current views on panic disorder and agoraphobia has been proposed. The management principles including the role of cognitive therapy and pharmacotherapy have been discussed.


Subject(s)
Adult , Agoraphobia/physiopathology , Anxiety , Humans , Male , Models, Neurological , Panic Disorder/diagnosis
4.
Indian J Exp Biol ; 1989 Jan; 27(1): 41-3
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-55658

ABSTRACT

Cyclosporine has been reported to suppress the tensile strength of healing incision wound. Prednisolone, an inducer of hepatic microsomal enzymes, abolished the tensile strength suppressant effect of cyclosporine. Cyclosporine is metabolized by the hepatic cytochrome P-450 enzymes. Induction of microsomal enzymes with phenobarbitone was evaluated for its effect upon the wound healing suppressant effect of cyclosporine. Pretreatment of male rats with phenobarbitone (75 mg/kg/day, ip) for 3 days resulted in alleviating the tensile strength suppressant effect of cyclosporine (5 mg/kg/day, po for 10 days). Phenobarbitone, per se, did not affect the tensile strength. That phenobarbitone prevents cyclosporine induced nephrotoxicity without affecting the humoral immunosuppressant action of cyclosporine has recently been reported. The possibility of modulating microsomal enzymes with phenobarbitone offers another approach in preventing cyclosporine-associated toxicities during immunosuppression.


Subject(s)
Animals , Cyclosporins/pharmacology , Drug Interactions , Male , Phenobarbital/pharmacology , Rats , Tensile Strength/drug effects , Wound Healing/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL