ABSTRACT
Trigeminal neuralgia is a sudden and painful facial condition that is triggered by activities of daily living. The pain is debilitating and patients are often unable to perform routine daily tasks such as washing their face, shaving, and brushing their teeth, which in turn has an impact on their social life and mental well-being as they are often anxious and fearful of not knowing when the pain may occur.Current Concepts: Treatment for trigeminal neuralgia involves local nerve destruction surgeries, including neuroblocking, percutaneous ethanol injection therapy, percutaneous radio-frequency rhizotomy, and gamma knife surgery. Although these types of surgeries reduce pain, the side effects are unpleasant and include decreased facial sensation, which originates from the damage to the trigeminal nerve. Furthermore, these surgeries provide insufficient long-term outcomes and symptoms often recur. Microvascular decompression is a radical surgical approach that separates the blood vessels that cause pain from the nerves. In a large-scale study, microvascular decompression significantly reduced the pain in 80–96% of the patients who underwent initial treatment. Of these, 85% experienced significant pain reduction 38 months post-surgery, and 72–85% reported that they were able to manage their pain 5 years post-surgery. Currently, microvascular decompression is the most appropriate surgical approach to control pain in patients with trigeminal neuralgia, as it exhibits the highest rate of pain control and lowest rate of recurrence.Discussion and Conclusion: The accurate diagnosis of trigeminal neuralgia, through clinical symptoms and imaging, is important to obtain good treatment outcomes. Microvascular decompression should be considered when a patient responds poorly to initial treatment approaches, cannot receive surgical treatment due to side effects, or experiences pain recurrence following local nerve destruction.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Intracranial ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms (VADAns) are associated with high morbidity and mortality when left untreated due to the high likelihood of rebleeding. The present study aimed to establish an endovascular therapeutic strategy that focuses specifically on the angioarchitecture of ruptured VADAns. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with ruptured VADAn received endovascular treatment (EVT) over 7 years. The patient group included 14 women (60.9%) and 9 men (39.1%) between the ages of 39 and 72 years (mean age 54.2 years). Clinical data and radiologic findings were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Four patients had aneurysms on the dominant vertebral artery. Fourteen (61%) aneurysms were located distal to the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA). Six (26%) patients had an extracranial origin of the PICA on the ruptured VA, and 2 patients (9%) had bilateral VADAns. Eighteen patients (78%) were treated with internal coil trapping. Two patients (9%) required an adjunctive bypass procedure. Seven patients (30%) required stent-supported endovascular procedures. Two patients experienced intra-procedural rupture during EVT, one of which was associated with a focal medullary infarction. Two patients (9%) exhibited recanalization of the VADAn during follow-up, which required additional coiling. No recurrent hemorrhage was observed during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: EVT of ruptured VADAns based on angioarchitecture is a feasible and effective armamentarium to prevent fatal hemorrhage recurrence with an acceptable low risk of procedural complications. Clinical outcomes depend mainly on the pre-procedural clinical state of the patient. Radiologic follow-up is necessary to prevent hemorrhage recurrence after EVT.