Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Journal of Chinese Physician ; (12): 672-675,681, 2022.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-932118

ABSTRACT

Objective:To investigate the effect of growth hormone (GH) supplementation during luteal phase one cycle before ovulation induction in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET).Methods:IVF-ET pregnancy-assisted patients who underwent long-term Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone-agonist (GnRH-a) protocol from January 1, 2019 to June 30, 2020 were collected from the Reproductive Center of Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Hospital. Among them, 106 patients (GH group) were added with GH during luteal phase one cycle before ovulation induction, and 212 patients (control group) were not added with GH. Ovulation induction and pregnancy outcome were compared between the two groups.Results:(1) There was no statistically significant difference in primary infertility/secondary infertility rate, infertility years, age, and transplant cancellation cycle rate between the two groups (all P>0.05). (2) There were no significant differences in the number of oocytes obtained, MII oocytes, two pronucleus (2PN) oocytes, high-quality embryos and average number of transplanted embryos between GH group and control group (all P>0.05). The total amount of Gn in control group and GH group was (2 109.75±555.75)IU and (1 863±610.52)IU, respectively, with statistically significant difference ( P<0.05). (3) The embryo implantation rate of the control group and GH group was 43.73%(129/295) and 60.42%(87/144), respectively, with statistically significant difference ( P<0.05). The clinical pregnancy rates of the control group and GH group were 58.79%(107/182) and 71.91%(64/89), the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05). The spontaneous abortion rate of early pregnancy in control group (4.67%, 5/107) was slightly higher than that in GH group (3.12%, 2/64), but there was no significant statistical difference ( P>0.05). Conclusions:For patients with normal ovarian response, adding small dose of growth hormone during luteal stage one cycle before controlled hyperovulation can improve the embryo implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate, and reduce the amount of Gn, which is beneficial to patients.

2.
Journal of Chinese Physician ; (12): 1184-1187,1192, 2022.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-956281

ABSTRACT

Objective:To explore effects of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocols on pregnancy outcomes for patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET). Methods:A total of 1 032 patients with PCOS who underwent IVF-ET from September 1, 2016 to July 31, 2020 in the Reproductive Center of Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into modified long regimen group (group A, 126 cases), luteal phase long regimen group (group B, 185 cases), antagonist regimen group (group C, 344 cases), and progestin primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) group(group D, 377 cases) according to different ovulation stimulation regimens. The ovulation promotion status [days of gonadotropin (Gn), total amount of Gn, estradiol (E 2) level on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) injection, number of retrieved eggs, number of mature eggs (MII eggs), number of normal fertilized embryos (2PN), number of high-quality embryos] and the first frozen embryo transfer pregnancy status (clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, early abortion rate) were compared among the patients in each group. Results:(1) There was no significant difference in general clinical data between the four groups (all P>0.05). (2) The number of Gn days in group D was significantly less than that in groups A, B and C, and the total number of Gn was significantly less than that in groups A, B and C (all P<0.05); The E 2 level of patients in group C and group D on the day of hCG injection was significantly lower than that of group A and group B (all P<0.05); The number of eggs obtained and MII eggs in group C and group D were significantly lower than those in group A and group B (all P<0.05); The number of high-quality embryos and 2PN in group D were significantly different from those in group A, group B and group C (all P<0.05). (3) The clinical pregnancy rates of the first frozen embryo transfer after whole embryo cryopreservation in group A, group B, group C and group D were 54.72%(29/53), 56.79%(46/81), 52.56%(82/156) and 54.32%(195/359), respectively, with no significant difference among the four groups (all P>0.05). There was no significant difference in embryo implantation rate and early abortion rate among the four groups (all P>0.05). Conclusions:The modified long regimen, luteal phase long regimen, antagonist regimen and PPOS regimen can achieve better pregnancy outcomes in patients with PCOS. Among them, PPOS regimen can reduce the amount and time of Gn, and frozen embryo transfer does not affect the pregnancy outcome of patients. It can be used as one of the priority recommended strategies for PCOS patients who plan to undergo frozen embryo transfer.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL