ABSTRACT
A case of primary chondrosarcoma of the left lung in 50 year-old man is presented. The tumor was diagnosed as primary chondrosarcoma of the lung after exclusion of any primary lesion elsewhere. Histologically, tumor consisted of predominantly chondromatous lesion. Immunohistochemistry showed that tumor cells positive for S-100 protein and vimentin, and negative for epithelial markers. On the basis of clinical, histological and immunohistochemical studies, the tumor was diagnosed as a primary chondrosarcoma of the lung.
Subject(s)
Chondrosarcoma/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Lung/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Male , S100 Proteins/metabolism , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Vimentin/metabolismABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness and accuracy of cytologic smears by making crush preparation as a diagnostic method, in central nervous system tumors. 278 patients with central nervous system tumors were investigated. In 98 cases, material was obtained intraoperatively during craniotomy and in 180 cases stereotactic biopsies were done. In all the cases crush preparations were made, and cytologic diagnosis was correlated with final histologic diagnosis. 244 out of 278 patients showed correlation with histopathological diagnosis. So, in present study diagnostic accuracy was 87.76%. In 18 cases no definite diagnosis was made due to inadequate material. Majority of the patients were in age group 31 to 40 years (72 cases). The youngest patient was three years old and the eldest was 87 years old. The most common tumor in intracranial cavity was astrocytoma (56.68%), followed by meningioma (6.88%), medulloblastoma (5.66%) and ependymoma (5.56%). The most common tumor in intraspinal cavity was ependymoma (38.46%), followed by meningioma (23.07%) and schwannoma (23.07%). In conclusion, crush preparation is an effective, simple, rapid, relatively safe and reliable technique for the diagnosis of central nervous system tumors. Diagnostic accuracy of cytology with final histopathological report is established with accuracy rate of 87.76%.
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Astrocytoma/diagnosis , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/diagnosis , Child , Child, Preschool , Cytodiagnosis , Cytological Techniques/methods , Ependymoma/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Medulloblastoma/diagnosis , Meningioma/diagnosis , Middle Aged , Neurilemmoma/diagnosis , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
Hepatoblastoma (HBL) is the most common primary malignant hepatic tumor in children. The aim of the present study is to describe cytological findings of HBL, to subclassify it, and to discuss differential diagnoses. Twenty cases were taken from records of Cytopathology department, Gujarat Cancer and Research Institute, Ahmedabad. The aspiration smears were stained with Papanicolaou stain andlor Giemsa stain. Cytological and architectural criteria were applied to aspiration smears. Fifteen cases (75%) of HBL were diagnosed in the patients below the age of two years. The commonest presentation was found to be lump in abdomen. On the basis of cytoarchitectural features, HBL was classified in two groups undifferentiated and differentiated. Morphologically, the tumor cells were commonly arranged in acinar pattern, papillary pattern, or in sheets. FNA cytology alone had some limitations in the diagnosis of HBL. Hence, cytoarchitecture in combination with clinicalfeatures, imaging techniques and serum a-fetoprotein levels were helpful for specific diagnosis of HBL and to rule out various others differential diagnosis of small round cell tumor. The cytological differential diagnosis between differentiated HBL and Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was found to be very difficult.