Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-198653

ABSTRACT

Background: Embryology forms an important part of Anatomy in medical curriculum. As a subject it is difficultfor the first year students. The aim of the study was to make the subject simple, to inculcate interest and to reachto different types of learners as possible and to assess the effect of various teaching methods on learning.Methods: First year medical students were taught Embryology using different methods over one academic yearby one faculty member. In addition to black board and power point as the main methods of teaching, supplementarymethods like videos, props, models, handouts & quiz were also used. These were compared on different parametersof teaching-learning process like conceptual understanding, recollection & long term memory, reproducibility &writing in exam, structure and sequence of events, drawing of diagrams, clinical application, overall effectivenessand fun in the process of learning. A comparison of different methods of teaching was done in the form a writtenfeedback questionnaire.Results: It was observed that 73.9% students preferred Black board, 21.73% preferred Power point and 4.34%opted for videos as the choice of method. The study also revealed that 76.08% of students preferred a combinationof different methods for the embryology lectures, where as 15.21% preferred only Black Board, 6.52% preferredonly Power Point and 2.17% of students preferred only Videos as the method for learning Embryology.Most of the parameters of teaching Embryology were better fulfilled by black board method specially drawing ofdiagrams (82.60% students). However for clinical application of the subject, power point (50.43% students) waspreferred. The students’ response revealed that Quiz was a fun loving method of learning (40%students), whereas(31.3%students) enjoyed videos on Embryology. The overall effectiveness of Black board was found to be (60.86%),Power point (18.2%), Videos (8.69%), Props (4.34%), Quiz (3.47%), Handouts (2.6%) and Models (1.73%).Conclusions: A multi-modal approach was made to facilitate and enhance the learning process of the subject. Thestudy revealed that blackboard was the most valued method for teaching-learning Embryology.

2.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-198647

ABSTRACT

Background: Recognition of the maxillary sinus position is tedious as it is small and not easily seen. A detailedknowledge of the anatomical variations of maxillary sinus opening is required for endoscopic surgeons toperform safe surgeries. The aim of the present study is to determine the anatomical location of the maxillaryostium in a cadaveric specimen. The position of the accessory maxillary sinus, if present is also noted to furtherbenefit the surgeons.Materials and Methods: Thirty bisected halves of the formalin fixed adult head and neck specimens were obtainedfrom the Department of Anatomy. The anterior part of the skull was divided in the midline and then the nasalseptum was removed taking care not to damage the osteomeatal components. Probes were used in identifyingthe location of maxillary sinus ostium. Various other parameters like vertical diameter, transverse diameter,distance between ostium and anatomical landmarks such as inferior concha and hard palate were measured.Results: In accordance to the parameters considered in the current study, the following results were observed.The maxillary sinus ostium was present in the posterior 1/3rd of the Hiatus semilunaris in 53% of the cadavers.The most common shape of maxillary sinus ostium was oval. The mean vertical and transverse diameters ofostium were 2mm and 2.6mm respectively. The perpendicular distance of the ostium from the lower border ofinferior concha was 14.6 mm and from the upper border of the hard palate was 17.5 mm.Conclusion: The knowledge about the variations in location of the maxillary sinus Ostium and the distances ofthe ostium from the major anatomical landmarks will help the maxillofacial surgeons and otolaryngeologists toperform the surgical procedures safely.

3.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-198632

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The sinonasal region is often imaged because of infectious and allergic diseases of the nasal cavityand paranasal sinuses. Improved knowledge of normal pneumatization and development of paranasal sinusesis important to allow sinus diseases to be evaluated and an adequate treatment to be proposed.Materials and methods: 100 patients (72 males and 28 females) undergoing coronal and axial sections of computedtomography scan of maxillary sinus of head and neck aged between 1year to 90 years at the Radiology Department,Vydehi Institute of Medical Science & Research Centre Bangalore for reasons other than due to craniofacialabnormalities or sinus problem were taken for the study. Volume and dimensions of the maxillary sinuses withits anatomical variations were obtained. Mean, SD, significant difference between age & gender was calculated.Results: Maxillary sinuses in Males on both sides have higher values in mean height, depth and volume thanfemales except right side width which was lesser in value than females. All the mean parameters were more onleft sinus both in male and females, except mean height of right sinus in males, on side comparison all the meanparameters were more on right side in females. There is a significant difference in mean height of right and leftmaxillary sinus in between male and female. There is a significant difference on right and left side widthbetween male and female in the age group 51-60 yrs and 61-70 yrs. The maximum age growth in males was during11-20 yrs and 41-50 yrs in height, width and volume, in 21-30 yrs and 31-40 yrs in depth, later dimensions weredecreasing in growth by 61-70 yrs in height and 81-90 yrs both in depth, width and volume. In females maximumgrowth was in 21-30 yrs and 51-70 yrs for height, depth, volume, 11-20 yrs and 51-60 yrs for width dimensions, laterdecreases by 61-70 yrs onwards in height, width and 11-20 yrs in depth and volume.Conclusion: These results will be helpful in understanding normal and pathological conditions of the maxillarysinuses and useful in clinical planning of medical or surgical interventions of the maxillary sinuses

4.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-198621

ABSTRACT

Background: Assessment is one of the most important aspect of teaching and learning process. Various assessmentmethods are available to assess the knowledge & skills of students. The objective of the study was to know viewsof the students regarding the best assessment method in anatomy.Materials and methods: Inputs from 200 MBBS students were collected who completed first year MBBS. Aquestionnaire which included questions relating to various assessment techniques for theory & practical internalexams in anatomy was used to get the feedback from the students.Results: Majority students felt that internal assessment should be conducted thrice in a year. The assessmentmethods preferred by them was written test for theory in the form of SAQ & SEQ and MCQ also should be includedin it. Many students felt that internal assessment should be the criteria for allowing students to appear inuniversity examinations but disagreed to include the internal assessment marks in university examination.Conclusion: It is important to obtain more frequent feedback from the students which will help teachers to modifythe assessment methods and improve the standards of medical education

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL