Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
International Journal of Laboratory Medicine ; (12): 2957-2958,3001, 2014.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-600251

ABSTRACT

Objective To understand the result coincidence of 4 hematology analyzers (LH780 ,LH750 ,XN-1000 ,and XS-1000i) .Methods 20 samples of routine blood test were selected and detected by different hematology analyzers whose within-run precision and between-run precision all met the requirements of WS/T 406 standard .LH750 was chose to be the reference instru-ment ,and its detection results were standard values .The relative deviations and coincidence rates of WBC ,RBC ,Hb ,HCT , PLT ,MCV ,MCH and MCHC of the other 3 hematology analyzers were calculated .The WBC and PLT coincidence results of 82 cases of low-WBC samples ,86 cases of low-PLT samples ,and 35 cases of platelet aggregation samples were investigated .Results The coincidence rates of all items were more than 90% between LH780 and LH750 .For XN-1000/XS-1000i ,the coincidence rate was 80% in HCT ,and which were less than 80% in MCV and MCHC ,and more than 85% in other items .After readjusting the calibration factors of HCT of XN-1000 and XS-1000i ,the coincidence rates of HCT ,MCV and MCHC were all increased to more than 85% .The coincidence rates of WBC and PLT were less than 70% in low-WBC samples (WBC<1 .0 × 109/L) and low-PLT samples (PLT<30 × 109/L) .The results of WBC and PLT could not reach the relative deviation standards in 35 platelet aggrega-tion samples .Conclusion The comparative tests should be carried out among different hematology analyzers in one laboratory .

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL