Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-139004

ABSTRACT

Background & objectives: Development of insecticide resistance in malaria vectors has been a major problem for achieving effective vector control. Due to limited availability of insecticides, the only option is management of resistance by judiciously using the insecticides and rotating them to maintain their effectiveness. This study was carried out in a malaria endemic area of Sundergarh district in Orissa where synthetic pyrethroids (SP) were in use for the last couple of years. The change-over from SP to DDT was done in one arm of study, and the other two arms remained on SP and insecticide-treated nets (ITN). Entomological and parasitological monitoring was done to assess the impact. Methods: The study design comprised of three arms (i) two rounds of indoor residual spraying (IRS) with DDT 1g/m2 as a change-over insecticide in areas previously under synthetic pyrethroids; (ii) two rounds of IRS with synthetic pyrethroid (alphacypermethrin, ACM) @ 25 mg/m2; and (iii) an unsprayed area under ITN/long lasting insecticide nets (LNs). Indoor residual spraying was undertaken under strict supervision to maintain quality and coverage. Contact bioassays were conducted to know the persistence of insecticide on sprayed surfaces and adult vector density was monitored in fixed and randomly selected houses. Malaria incidence was measured through fortnightly domiciliary surveillance under primary health care system in all the study villages. Results: The insecticide susceptibility tests showed that An.culicifacies was resistant to DDT but susceptible to malathion and ACM. However, An. fluviatilis was susceptible to all the three insecticides. ACM was effective in killing An. culicifacies on mud and wooden sprayed surfaces and maintained effective bioefficacy ranging from 92 to 100 per cent up to five months, whereas DDT failed to achieve effective mortality in An.culicifacies. However, there was significant decline in the density of An.culicifacies in ACM and DDT areas in comparison to ITNs/LNs. There was 61 per cent reduction in the slide positivity rate in ACM area in comparison to 48 and 51 per cent in DDT and ITN/LNs areas, respectively. The adjusted incidence rate of malaria cases per 1000 population in three study areas also showed significant declines within each group. Interpretation & conclusions: The present findings show that the change-over of insecticide from synthetic pyrethroids to DDT brings about the same epidemiological impact as envisaged from continuing SP spray or distributing insecticide treated nets/long-lasting insecticidal nets provided there is a good quality spray and house coverage.


Subject(s)
Animals , Anopheles , DDT , Endemic Diseases , Humans , India/epidemiology , Insect Vectors , Insecticide Resistance , Insecticides , Malaria/prevention & control , Malaria/transmission , Mosquito Control/methods , Pesticide Residues/analysis , Pyrethrins
2.
J Vector Borne Dis ; 2003 Sep-Dec; 40(3-4): 92-9
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-117980

ABSTRACT

A standardised protocol has been developed by World Health Organization (CDS/RBM/2002) to assess the efficacy of common antimalarials in the treatment of clinically manifested infection with uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria for areas with low to moderate transmission. The therapeutic efficacy protocol is based on clinical and parasitological responses of the patients and it has the purpose of determining the practical efficacy of the drug regimen in study areas with the ultimate objective of ascertaining its continued usefulness or the necessity for replacing it in the routine treatment. Present study has been conducted at seven sites--Kathiatali and Simonabasti of District Nowgaon, Assam; Sonapur and Boko of District Kamrup, Assam; Keonjhar Town, Padampur and Basudebpur of District Keonjhar, Orissa. In order to reduce the patient recruitment time, health centre close to well-defined community was identified to conduct the activities at peak malaria season by selecting local pockets and organising mobile clinics. Microscopically confirmed cases of P. falciparum were enrolled according to the criteria for inclusion and exclusion. Treatment with recommended drug was given under supervision and a follow-up schedule at various intervals for 28 days was maintained. In chloroquine (CQ) study areas, wherever patients showed treatment failure, they were treated with second line drug--sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) combination and then followed-up as per study protocol. It was observed that 30% cases showed treatment failure to CQ in District Nowgaon, where revised drug policy has already been introduced. In Kamrup district, treatment failure with CQ was found to be less than 25%, which denotes the said regimen is still effective. Almost all the patients from Padampur and Basudebpur of District Keonjhar responded to CQ, treatment failure was noticed only in two patients (3%). The antifolate combination found to be fully effective as second line and also as first line wherever revised drug policy has been introduced.


Subject(s)
Animals , Antimalarials/therapeutic use , Chloroquine/therapeutic use , Drug Combinations , Drug Resistance , Drug Therapy, Combination , Humans , India , Malaria, Falciparum/drug therapy , Plasmodium falciparum , Pyrimethamine/therapeutic use , Sulfadoxine/therapeutic use , Treatment Failure
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL