Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
China Pharmacy ; (12): 137-139, 2016.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-501394

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:To study sterility test after using Non-PVC bivalve soft-bag injection in PIVAS. METHODS:The test was divided into 3 groups according to the type of transfusion solution packaging and dispensing environment. Group 1 received Glucose solution using bivalve soft-bag,dispensed in PIVAS;group 2 received Glucose solution using bivalve soft-bag,dispensed in wards area;group 3 received Glucose solution using plastic bottle,dispensed in wards area. After puncturing 1,3,6,9 times (n=80),finished products placed in ward for 0,2,4,6 h(n=20),and then sterility test was conducted with membrane filtra-tion method stated in second part of Chinese Pharmacopoeia (2010 edition). Infusion contamination of 3 groups was analyzed at 9th puncture. RESULTS:The growth of bacteria was not found in group 1;the positive detection rate of group 2 and 3 were 2.5%and 3.8%(n=320). The total positive detection rates after puncturing 1,3,6,9 times were 0,0.4%,0.4%,7.5%(n=240);the positive detection rates of group 1 were all 0,those of group 2 were 0,1.25%,0,8.75%and those of group 3 were 0,0,1.25%, 13.75%(n=80). After 9 times of puncture,the positive detection rates of group 1 after placing 0,2,4,6 h were all 0,those of group 2 were 25%,5%,0,5%;those of group 3 were 5%,15%,5%,30%(n=20). CONCLUSIONS:The use of the Non-PVC bi-valve soft-bag injection in PIVAS can effectively prevent microbial contamination.

2.
Journal of Chinese Physician ; (12): 621-623, 2011.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-416289

ABSTRACT

Objective To investigate the effect of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) on the expression of endothelial protein C receptor (EPCR) and protease activated receptor 1 (PAR1) in abdominal vascular endothelial cells (VECs) of septic rats. Methods VECs were cultured by tissue-sticking method, and the purity was determined with flow cytometry (FCM). VECs were randomly divided into three groups: control group, septic group (LPS 1 μg/ml) and LMWH group (LPS 1 μg/ml+LMWH 5 μg/ml). The VECs were collected at 1st, 3rd, 5th days after stimulated. The expression of EPCR and PAR1 were assessed by FCM. Results The expression of EPCR and PAR1 of septic group decreased significantly compared with control group at each time point (P<0.05 or P<0.01), and the expression decreased most obviously on day 5 (26.53±7.21 vs 39.26±2.62,q=6.45,P<0.01;53.21±15.10 vs 86.54±11.34,q=6.94,P<0.01). In LMWH group, the levels of EPCR and PAR1 expression were higher than setpic group at each time point (P<0.05). Compared to control group, the expression of EPCR had a significantly decrease on day 1 (40.86±1.63 vs 45.41±2.82,q=3.51,P<0.05), which had no significantly different on day 3 and 5 (41.20±3.32 vs 42.83±2.66,P>0.05;39.23±3.33 vs 39.26±2.62,P>0.05), and the expression of PAR1 were not significantly decrease compared with control group at each time point (P>0.05). Conclusions LMWH could improve the inhibition status and the expression of EPCR and PAR1 on VECs in septic rats.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL