ABSTRACT
Objective:To observe the influence of multi-disciplinary cooperation and optimization management mode on the negative situation and rehabilitation effect of patients with affective disorder after coronary heart disease and cerebrovascular disease.Methods:A total of 188 patients with emotional disorders caused by coronary heart disease and cerebrovascular disease from January 2017 to December 2018 to our hospital were selected. According to the random number method, 94 cases in the control group adopted the conventional management model, and 94 cases in the experimental group adopted the multidisciplinary collaborative optimization management model. The negative emotions [evaluated by Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-rating Depression Scale(SDS) ] scores before and after management, the coping style (Jalowies) scores, and quality of life [evaluated by World Health Organization Quality of Life-Brief (WHOQOL-BREF) ] scores were compared between the two groups. The clinical rehabilitation effect and satisfaction rate of related management between the two groups were compared.Results:There were no significant differences between the two groups before management of SAS scores, SDS scores, Jalowies scores, and WHOQOL-BREF quality of life scores ( P> 0.05). After management, the SAS scores and SDS scores of the two groups were significantly reduced, and the Jalowies scores and WHOQOL-BREF quality of life scores were significantly increased. After management, the SAS score and SDS score of the experimental group were 47.32±5.68, 49.93±6.49 and 54.95±6.59, 55.33±8.30 in the control group, the difference was significant between two groups ( t value was 8.503, 4.969, P<0.01). The Jalowies scores and WHOQOL-BREF scores of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group ( t value was -27.662--4.290, P<0.01). The total effective rate of rehabilitation in the experimental group was 98.94%(93/94), which was significantly higher than 90.43%(85/94) in the control group, the difference was statistically significant ( χ2 value was 6.760, P <0.05). The total satisfaction rate of the experimental group for management intervention was 100.00%(94/94), which was significantly higher than the total satisfaction rate of the control group, 91.49%(86/94), the difference was statistically significant ( χ2 value was 6.397, P <0.05). Conclusions:In the patients with affective disorder caused by coronary heart disease and cerebrovascular disease, multi-disciplinary cooperation and optimization management mode can significantly reduce the negative emotions of patients after management, improve the way of patients to deal with the disease, effectively improve the clinical rehabilitation effect and the quality of life of patients, improve the satisfaction rate of patients with management, shorten the distance between nurses and patients, and achieve ideal results.