ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the air permeability,water absorption and water locking properties of two different foam dressings,thus to provide theoretical and experimental evidence to alternative optimization for acute and chronic wound.Methods Five Mepilex foam dressings(group 1) and PermaFoam Comfort dressings(group 2) each was selected.Simulated wound exudation was made by NaCl and CaCl·H2O.The water-absorbing rate of dressings at post immersion 24 h (PIH),the water-absorbing speed of dressings at post immersion 1,5,10,20 min,the diffusion diameter of exudation dripped on the surface of dressings for 5 min,the beaker filled with exudation was sealed tightly by dressing for 24 h,and the weight was gotten before and after 24 h.Statistical analysis was performed.Results (1) The water-absorbing rate:the group 1(616±19)% was significantly higher than (313±13)% of the group 2 (t=29.137,P0.05).Conclusion The Mepilex foam dressing is more suitable for the early stage of acute wound with large exudation in short time,while the PermaFoam Comfort dressings is better for chronic wound or the later period of acute with less exudation in a relative slow seepage velocity.
ABSTRACT
Objective To observe the changes of blood sugar following use of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) in patients with severe burn. Methods A total of 140 patients with severe burn but with no history of diabetes were randomly and equally divided into Group A ( 18-44 years old) and Group B ( ≥45 years old) according to WHO criteria. Then, two groups were randomly divided Group B0 (treated with normal saline), 35 patients per group. Change of blood sugar and amount of insuline for control of blood sugar were observed and analyzed. Results Of 140 patients in four groups,128 patients accomplished the test, with no statistical difference upon general conditions between groups (P ＞0.05 ). Within four weeks after test, the amount of insuline used for control of blood sugar was (2908.0 ± 153.5) IU and (724.1 ± 31.1 ) IU respectively in Groups A1 and A0, (3725.9 ± 88.4) IU and (801.8 ±22.2) IU respectively in Groups B1 and BO. The results showed that the patients needing insulin to control blood sugar in Group B were more than that in Group A ( P ＜ 0.01 ). The time for blood sugar recovering to normal range in patients with high blood sugar with no use of rhGH in Group A1 and Group B1 was (5.21 ±0.64) d and (5.03 ± 1.01) d respectively (P＞0.05). Conclusions The blood sugar of patients with severe burn will rise after use of rhGH. The age of the patients is positively correlated with changes of blood sugar. Standard use of rhGH does not induce diabetes.
ABSTRACT
ured with different techniques.Standardized application of somatropins will not induce diabetes.