ABSTRACT
Objective: Confirmation by pharmacists of brought-in drugs is not only limited to identification of drugs, but also requires prescription design and proposals based on the background of patients and evaluation of associated information. In this study, we analyzed the content of brought-in drugs related PreAVOID reports in our hospital according to the years of pharmacist experience in order to help educate pharmacist for better brought-in drugs confirmation.Method: Various interventions regarding brought-in drugs were compared between two groups: pharmacists with >6 years of experience (group H) and those with < 5 years of experience (group L). PreAVOID reports, which related to drugs brought in by patients admitted to the Ogaki Municipal Hospital between April 1, 2018 and March 31, 2019 were assessed.Result:The PreAVOID reporting rate for the number of brought-in drugs confirmed was higher in group H (1.56%) than in group L (1.12%) (odds ratio 1.399, p = 0.023). The PreAVOID reporting rate when reporting was based solely on prescription information did not differ between these two groups, but when patient background, including disease-related information, was included with prescription information, the rate was higher in group H (0.80%) than in group L (0.30%) (odds ratio 2.725, p < 0.001). Group H provided more reports related to unnecessary drugs.Conclusion: The involvement of pharmacists in the evaluation of brought-in drugs is important when reviewing subsequent medical treatments. Our findings suggest that to improve the quality of treatment, it is necessary to provide appropriate newcomer education, such as conducting case studies using PreAVOID cases.