Pregnancy-Associated Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: A Case Report and the Lessons from Practice

@#Pregnancy-associated spontaneous coronary artery dissection (P-SCAD) is one of the fatal conditions that most commonly causes pregnancy-associated myocardial infarction. We herein report a case of P-SCAD in a 26-year-old multigravida woman, who complained of angina postpartum with raised cardiac biomarkers and transient ST-segment elevation on electrocardiograms. We emphasize the importance of a high degree of suspicion in the diagnosis of P-SCAD, together with the common presentation, the management approach, and its psychological impacts on the patients.

Comparison between FEV1/FEV6 and FEV1/FVC as screening of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Objective: To compare FEV1/FEV6 to the standard spirometry (FEV1/FVC) as a screening tool for COPD. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Hospital Tuanku Fauziah, Perlis, Malaysia from August 2015 to April 2016. FEV1/FEV6 and FEV1/FVC results of 117 subjects were analysed. Demographic data and spirometric variables were tabulated. A scatter plot graph with Spearman’s correlation was constructed for the correlation between FEV1/FEV6 and FEV1/FVC. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of FEV1/FEV6 were determined with reference to the gold standard of FEV1/FVC ratio <0.70. Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and Kappa statistics were used to determine the FEV1/FEV6 ratio in predicting an FEV1/FVC ratio <0.70. Results: Spearman’s correlation with r = 0.636 (P<0.001) was demonstrated. The area under the ROC curve was 0.862 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.779 - 0.944, P<0.001). The FEV1/FEV6 cut-off with the greatest sum of sensitivity and specificity was 0.75. FEV1/FEV6 sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 93.02%, 67.74%, 88.89% and 77.78% respectively. There was substantial agreement between the two diagnostic cut-offs (κ = 0.634; 95% CI: 0.471 - 0.797, P<0.001) Conclusions: The FEV1/FEV6 ratio can be considered to be a good alternative to the FEV1/FVC ratio for screening of COPD. Larger multicentre study and better education on spirometric techniques can validate similar study outcome and establish reference values appropriate to the population being studied.