Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects. 2007; 1 (1): 27-32
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-83346

ABSTRACT

Retreatment of existing restorations not only requires a lot of money and time but also there is a danger of weakening tooth structure and irritating the pulp. Since awareness of the reasons for the retreatment of teeth will save the teeth from possible future failure, the aim of this study was to assess the reasons for retreatment of amalgam and composite restorations in patients referring to Tabriz Faculty of Dentistry. In this descriptive study, the subjects had previously received an amalgam or a composite restoration in the Operative Department by dental students and were judged to need retreatment in their second visit. A total of 300 defective teeth were selected by simple random sampling method. The data was collected through examination and questionnaires and analyzed using chi-square test. There was a statistically significant association between the type of the restorative material and the reason for retreatment [p=0.001]. Although the reasons for the retreatment of amalgam and composite restorations were different, recurrent caries was the main reason for the retreatment for both restorative materials


Subject(s)
Humans , Composite Resins , Retreatment , Dental Restoration Failure , Surveys and Questionnaires , Dental Caries , Dental Restoration, Permanent
2.
Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects. 2007; 1 (1): 43-47
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-83348

ABSTRACT

Dental handpiece is a source of contamination because it is in constant touch with the oral cavity. Sterilization does not seem to be sufficient to prevent penetration of microorganisms into air and water lines of the unit, because negative pressure developed by valves [which are placed in water outlets] and post shut-off inertial rotation of handpiece result in water and debris being sucked into air and water outlets of dental unit. The aim of this study was to compare dental unit contamination following use of clean head system handpieces and conventional handpieces. Twenty-two dental units in the Department of Pediatric Dentistry in Shahid Beheshti Faculty of Dentistry were used for the purpose of this study. A 1.5x10[8] cfu/mm[3] concentration of Staphylococcus epidermis [SE] was used to contaminate the air and water outlets of dental units. Ten clean head system handpieces and 10 conventional handpieces were used for 30 seconds in the above-mentioned suspension. Microbial samples were collected from the air and water lines. Culturing and colony counting procedures were carried out. Data was analyzed by t-test; a value of p < 0.01 was considered significant. demonstrated a significantly lower SE contamination in water outlets following the use of clean head system [p < 0.01]. A lower tendency of clean head system handpieces to transmit SE compared to conventional system makes them a better choice for infection control


Subject(s)
Dental Equipment/microbiology , Dental Instruments/microbiology , Water , Dental High-Speed Equipment/microbiology , Cross Infection , Infection Control , Staphylococcus epidermidis , Air
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL