ABSTRACT
The cervicothoracic junction (CTJ) is defined as the area extending from vertebral segment C7 to T2. Spinal metastases of CTJ are rare, range from 10% to less than 20%. A 47-year-old woman complained sensory and motor disturbance since 3 weeks prior to admission. History of lump on the left breast was confirmed. Neurological deficit was confirmed as ASIA C at the time of diagnosis. MRI finding suggest fracture of T1 vertebral body with kypothic angle 28° that causing anterior compression of spinal cord. The patient underwent decompression and posterior fusion from C4 to T4. A biopsy sample was also collected from the spine and left breast to confirm the diagnosis. Patient evaluation was done during discharge and at certain points of follow-up for improvement on its neurological, pain, and functional status. An MRI evaluation was performed to evaluate spinal stability and fusion. Significant improvements were observed in patient ambulatory and pain status. Cervicothoracic junction fusion procedure is a considerable choice for the management of pathological vertebral fractures with cervicothoracic junction involvement caused by spinal metastases of breast cancer.
ABSTRACT
Background: Hemiarthroplasty is now being considered as a primary treatment for comminuted unstable type of IT fracture in elderly on the grounds that it allows early mobilization and full weight bearing. Recently popular modality is fourth generation of intramedullary nails like the Proximal Femoral Nails. The goal of treatment is restoring mobility safely and efficiently, while minimizing the risk of medical complications and technical failure.Methods: A Forty patients, having Intertrochanteric fractures treated with PFNA or cemented BH at our institution between April 2016 and April 2017. The primary outcomes measures were postoperative complication and hip function. The secondary outcome measures were intraoperative blood loss, transfusion rate, surgical time, postoperative haemoglobin and hospital stay.Results: Seventeen patients in PFNA group and 23 patients in BH group were included for analysis. There were no significant differences between the two group regarding to the Harris Hip Score at 6 months follow up. Significant differences were found between PFNA and BH group in comparison of intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.001), length of stay (p = 0.006), surgical time (p < 0.001), postoperative transfusion (p < 0.001), and decrease of hemoglobin (p=0.001).Conclusions: These findings indicate that PFNA has obvious advantages over the BH in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in case of surgical trauma and postoperative complication.