Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Journal of Reproduction and Infertility. 2017; 18 (4): 379-385
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-190151

ABSTRACT

Background: Endometrium undergoes several changes in structure and cellular composition during pregnancy. Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factor [GCS-F] is an important cytokine with critical role in embryo implantation and pregnancy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of intrauterine injection of G-CSF in patients who suffer from unexplained recurrent miscarriage [RM]


Methods: In the present randomized clinical trial, a total of 68 patients were randomly allocated into two study groups including intrauterine G-CSF [n=23, 300mg] injection and control group [n=27, no G-CSF injection]. Eighteen out of 68 patients were excluded from the final analysis due to different reasons. All patients were in Ovulation Induction [I/O] cycle. In G-CSF group, intrauterine injection of G-CSF was done twice in the cycle. All enrolled patients were under 40 years old and had at least two unexplained pregnancy losses. Pregnancy was evaluated by titer of bhCG, presence of gestational sac [implantation] and fetal heart rate [clinical pregnancy] was assessed by vaginal ultrasonography. Student's T test and Mann-Whitney U were used for analysis. The p

Results: No significant differences were observed between the two study groups when the rates of chemical pregnancy [26.1%vs.29.6%, p=0.781], implantation [26.1%vs.22.2%, p=0.750], clinical pregnancy [17.4% vs.11.1%, p=0.689] and abortion [33%vs.37.5%, p=0.296] were compared


Conclusion: In our study, no significant difference was observed between the two study groups when the rates of chemical pregnancy, implantation, clinical pregnancy and abortion were compared

2.
Journal of Reproduction and Infertility. 2015; 16 (2): 96-101
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-165679

ABSTRACT

GnRH agonist administration in the luteal phase has been suggested to beneficially affect the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection [ICSI] and embryo transfer [ET] cycles. This blind randomized controlled study evaluates the effect of GnRH [Gonadotropine Releasing Hormone] agonist administration on ICSI outcome in GnRH antagonist ovarian stimulation protocol in women with 2 or more previous IVF/ICSI-ET failures. One hundred IVF failure women who underwent ICSI cycles and stimulated with GnRH antagonist ovarian stimulation protocol, were included in the study. Women were randomly assigned to intervention [received a single dose injection of GnRH agonist [0.1 mg of Decapeptil] subcutaneously 6 days after oocyte retrieval] and control [did not receive GnRH agonist] groups. Implantation and clinical pregnancy rates were the primary outcome measures. Although the age of women, the number of embryos transferred in the current cycle and the quality of the transferred embryos were similar in the two groups, there was a significantly higher rate of implantation [Mann Whitney test, p=0.041] and pregnancy [32.6% vs. 12.5%, p=0.030, OR=3.3, 95%CI, 1.08 to 10.4] in the in-tervention group. Our results suggested that, in addition to routine luteal phase support using progesterone, administration of 0.1 mg of Decapeptil 6 days after oocyte re-trieval in women with previous history of 2 or more IVF/ICSI failures led to a signif-icant improvement in implantation and pregnancy rates after ICSI following ovarian stimulation with GnRH antagonist protocol

3.
Journal of Reproduction and Infertility. 2015; 16 (3): 148-154
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-170163

ABSTRACT

Since increased LH in the early follicular phase in PCOS patients especially in GnRH antagonist protocol could be associated with reduced oocyte quality and pregnancy and impared implantation. The current study was conducted to determine ART outcomes in GnRH antagonist protocol [flexible] and long GnRH agonist protocol and compare them with adding GnRH antagonist in GnRH antagonist [flexible] protocol during early follicular phase in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing ICSI. In this randomized clinical trial, 150 patients with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing ICSI were enrolled from 2012 to 2014 and randomly assigned to receive either GnRH antagonist protocol during early and late follicular phase or GnRH antagonist protocol [flexible] or long GnRH agonist protocol. The clinical and laboratory pregnancy in three groups was determined and compared. In this context, the chi-square and Fisher's exact test and ANOVA were used for data analysis. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05. There was no statistically significant difference with respect to chemical pregnancy and clinical pregnancy between the three groups. Also, other indices such as number and quality of oocytes and embryos were alike. Totally, according to our results, GnRH antagonist protocol during early and late follicular phase and GnRH antagonist protocol [flexible] and long GnRH agonist protocol in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing ICSI are similarly effective and use of each one based on patients' condition and physicians' opinion could be considered

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL