Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences ; : 114-120, 2022.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-979955

ABSTRACT

@#Introduction: Laboratory tests account for 66% of clinical decision making and reducing inappropriate test utilisation is a step towards optimising patients’ care and hospital cost savings. This study aims to identify the rate and cost of redundant test requests in our centre. Methods: A cross-sectional study comprising laboratory results of 14 analytes in renal function test (RFT) and liver function test (LFT) were made. Data involved blood results from adult patients admitted to Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia from January to December 2018. The redundant test is defined as test results consecutively normal twice and requested within 26 hours for analytes in RFT and 50 hours for analytes in LFT. Cost contributions were estimated by multiplying cost-per-test with total redundant requests. The test redundancy in different wards and disease groups were also evaluated. Results: Equal distribution of RFT and LFT requests were observed in both genders (50% respectively), with the most requests seen in the 60 – 79 years age group. More than 20% redundancy rate was observed for seven analytes (ALT, total bilirubin, sodium, urea, potassium, AST, Chloride), and overall redundancy was 19.7%, equals to Malaysian Ringgit (MYR) 669,105.00. Oncology wards and genitourinary diseases contribute to the highest redundancy rate. Conclusion: This study estimated MYR 600 thousands of saving if test redundancy were to be eliminated. The finding is hoped to serve as a platform for future intervention and policymaking. Future planning to optimise the current laboratory request system and collaboration among physicians and laboratory professionals can minimise test inappropriateness.

2.
Annals of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism ; : 152-155, 2020.
Article | WPRIM | ID: wpr-830470

ABSTRACT

The gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) stimulation test is a valuable tool in diagnosing and differentiating causes of early pubertal occurrences. Utility of the test can be limited in some instances, however, including the early phases of pubertal hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis activation, in girls showing commonly overlapping pictures, and in obese children due to excess circulating estrogen that suppresses luteinizing hormone (LH). A lack of consistent baseline and stimulated gonadotropin cutoffs observed in different studies also contributes to limitations in testing. Nevertheless, early detection of true pathological causes for pubertal disorders is needed to allow prompt treatment and better prognosis. While basal LH can be beneficial as a good screening tool for detecting pubertal disorder, it does not preclude the need for GnRH testing. The aim of this review was to highlight the role of GnRH stimulation tests and varying testing cutoffs in diagnosis of precocious puberty and its classification.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL