The effect of 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 preloading on the blood glucose levels in diabetic patients undergoing orthopedic surgery with spinal anesthesia: a randomized pilot study

Background@#Perioperative hyperglycemia can occur in surgical patients and may increase postoperative morbidity and mortality, especially in patients with diabetes. Therefore, we conducted the present study to evaluate whether the administration of 6% hydroxyethyl starch (HES)-130/0.4 increases blood glucose levels in patients with diabetes. @*Methods@#Forty patients undergoing lower limb surgery under spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated into two groups according to the fluids administered 20 min before spinal anesthesia (Group L, lactated Ringer’s solution; Group H, 6% HES-130/0.4). Patient characteristics, intraoperative variables, blood glucose levels, mean blood pressure (MBP), and heart rate (HR) were recorded at five time-points (0, 20, 60, 120, and 240 min). @*Results@#A total of 39 patients were analyzed (Group L, n = 20; Group H, n = 19). The amount of intraoperative fluid was significantly higher in Group L than in Group H (718.2 ml vs. 530.0 ml, P = 0.010). There were no significant differences in the changes in blood glucose levels, HR, or MBP between the two groups (P = 0.737, P = 0.896, and P = 0.141, respectively). Serial changes in mean blood glucose levels from baseline also showed no significant differences between the groups (P = 0.764). @*Conclusions@#There were no significant changes in blood glucose levels when lactated Ringer’s solution or 6% HES-130 was used. When compared to the lactated Ringer’s solution, no evidence that 6% HES-130/0.4 produces hyperglycemia in diabetic patients could be found. Further evaluation of larger populations is needed.

Effect of hydroxyethyl starch on blood glucose levels / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: Hydroxyethyl starch (HES), a commonly used resuscitation fluid, has the property to induce hyperglycemia as it contains large ethyl starch, which can be metabolized to produce glucose. We evaluated the effect of 6% HES-130 on the blood glucose levels in non-diabetic patients undergoing surgery under spinal anesthesia. METHODS: Patients scheduled to undergo elective lower limb surgery were enrolled. Fifty-eight patients were divided into two groups according to the type of the main intravascular fluid used before spinal anesthesia (Group LR: lactated Ringer's solution, n = 30 vs. Group HES: 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4, n = 28). Blood glucose levels were measured at the following time points: 0 (baseline), 20 min (T1), 1 h (T2), 2 h (T3), 4 h (T4), and 6 h (T6). RESULTS: Mean blood glucose levels at T5 in the LR group and T4, T5 in the HES group, increased significantly compared to baseline. There were no significant changes in the serial differences of mean blood glucose levels from baseline between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of 6% HES-130 increased blood glucose levels within the physiologic limits, but the degree of glucose increase was not greater than that caused by administration of lactated Ringer's solution. In conclusion, we did not find evidence that 6% HES-130 induces hyperglycemia in non-diabetic patients.

Clinical evaluation of a newly designed fluid warming kit on fluid warming and hypothermia during spinal surgery / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: The Mega Acer Kit(R) (MAK) is a newly designed heated and humidified breathing circuit that warms fluid passing through the circuit lumen. In this study, we investigated the system's efficacy for the perioperative prevention of hypothermia and fluid warming. METHODS: Ninety patients undergoing spinal surgery were enrolled in this study and randomly assigned to 3 groups based on the fluid warming device used: no fluid warming system (Group C, n = 30), via a Standard Ranger (Group R, n = 30), or via the MAK (Group M, n = 30). Distal esophageal temperatures (Teso) and infusion fluid temperature (TF) were recorded at 15 min intervals for duration of 180 min during surgery. If Teso was < 35.0degrees C, a forced-air convective warming device was used. RESULTS: Final Teso values were 34.8 +/- 0.3degrees C, 35.1 +/- 0.1degrees C, and 35.8 +/- 0.3degrees C in groups C, R, and M, respectively (P < 0.01). Teso was significantly higher in group M when compared with that in groups C and R throughout the study period (P < 0.05). The number of patients requiring a forced-air convective warming device was significantly lower in group M (n = 0) when compared with that in groups R (n = 17) and C (n = 30) (P < 0.05). The final infusion fluid temperature was higher in group M when compared with that in groups C and R throughout the study period (35.4 +/- 1.0 vs. 23.0 +/- 0.3 and 32.8 +/- 0.6degrees C; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The MAK is more effective for preventing hypothermia and for warming fluid than the Standard Ranger.