Influence of fiberform on defecation condition after surgery for benign anorectal lesion / 中华胃肠外科杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To explore the influence of fiberform on the defecation condition after surgery for benign anorectal lesion.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A total of 121 cases undergoing surgery for benign anorectal lesion at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from October 2009 to February 2010 were randomly divided into the treatment group (n=61) and the control group (n=60) according to random number table. Patients in the treatment group received fiberform granule for 2 weeks while patients in the control group did not receive any medication to promote defecation. Postoperative defecation symptom scores and patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>On postoperative day 7, patients in the treatment group had a lower defecation smoothness score (62.1% decrease), lower fecal character score (74.3% decrease), lower defecation interval score (80.2% decrease), lower defecation pain score (77.5% decrease), the differences were statistically significant. On postoperative day 14, the degree of decrease of the abovementioned score were 58.3%, 88.5%, 82.8% and 83.1%, respectively. Postoperative patient satisfaction rate in the treatment group was significantly higher than that in the control group(P<0.05). No patient in the treatment group experienced any adverse events such as abdominal pain, diarrhea, and drug dependence.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Fiberform can effectively prevent defecation disorders such as dry stool, unsmooth defecation, and anorectal pain.</p>

Analysis on human papillomavirus 16 and 18 types infection among 805 patients with common anorectal lesions / 中华胃肠外科杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To analyze the infection condition of human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 and 18 in the squamous cells and columnar cells of patients with common anorecatal lesions.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Infections of HPV type 16 and 18 were determined with real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR in the wax-embedded surgical specimen of 805 patients with common anorectal diseases.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The overall infection rate among 805 patients with anorecatal lesions was 66.1% (532/805). The infection rate was 82.6% (95/115) in patients with mixed hemorrhoids, 76.5% (88/115) in anal papillary fibromas, 74.8% (86/115) in internal hemorrhoids, 72.2% (83/115) in fistulas, 69.6% (80/115) in external hemorrhoids, 47.8% (55/115) in anal perianal abscesses, and 39.1% (45/115) in anal fissures.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Infection rate of HPV type 16, 18 in common anorectal lesions is high.</p>

Study on the knowledge and attitude to adverse drug reactions reporting among healthcare professionals in Wuhan city / 中华流行病学杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To investigate the knowledge and attitudes of healthcare professionals (doctors, nurses and administrators) to adverse drug reactions (ADR) in Wuhan city and to identify the reasons for under-reporting.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Structured interviews were carried out in Wuhan, Hubei province. Questionnaire survey to approximately 15% of the medical practitioners selected from 16 hospitals, was conducted during the period from February to March 2003.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Only 2.7% of the interviewees knew the definition of adverse drug reactions. 61.7% of the doctors, 62.7% of the nurses and 61.1% of the administrators had ever encountered an ADR during their practices, but did not report to the national monitoring center or other centers. The major reasons for not reporting included: ignorant about the requirement and the reporting process of ADR (71.4%); address of the reporting agency and Forms unavailable (67.9%, 60.4%); unaware of the existence of a national ADR reporting system (52.2%); needless to report as the ADR being too well known (44.1%). They mainly reported an ADR to the hospital pharmacy or other departments, or to the pharmaceutical administration. Education, training and developing new institutions were ways to improve the reporting system.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Our results showed that healthcare professionals had little knowledge on the basic ADR knowledge. The main reasons for underreporting were related to factors on reporting process, address of related centers and unavailable of the Forms. Education and training to doctors and nurses to enhance the awareness of administrators were the ways to improve the reporting system.</p>

Awareness and attitudes of healthcare professionals in Wuhan, China to the reporting of adverse drug reactions / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>A voluntary procedure for reporting adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was formally put in place in 1989. However, only a small proportion of ADR reports are actually forwarded to the national monitoring center. To identify the reasons for underreporting, the authors investigated the awareness and attitudes of healthcare professionals (doctors, nurses, and administrators) toward the ADR system in China. In addition, the authors sought to formulate approaches to improve the current ADR reporting system.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Structured interviews were carried out in 16 hospitals selected from 27 municipal hospitals in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. A questionnaire survey of a stratified random sample of approximately 15% of healthcare professionals in each selected hospital was conducted during February to March 2003.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The response rate of this survey was 85%. One thousand six hundred and fifty-three questionnaires were used in the final analysis. Only 2.7% of the healthcare professionals had a correct understanding to the definition of ADR. Eighty-nine point two percent of the healthcare professionals had encountered ADRs. Ninety-four percent of them were aware of the need to report these to the ADR monitoring center. However, only 28.5% of doctors, 22.8% of nurses, and 29.7% of administrators actually submitted a report. For the most part, they reported ADRs to the hospital pharmacy (66.0%), to other departments in the hospital (72.5%), and to the pharmaceutical industry (23.0%), rather than to the national monitoring center (2.9%) or regional monitoring center (9.5%). Severe or rare ADRs and ADRs to new products were generally perceived to be significant enough to report. Sixty-two point one percent of the healthcare professionals had encountered ADRs, yet not reported them to anybody. The major reasons for not reporting included no knowledge of the reporting procedure (71.4%), unavailability of the reporting center mailing address (67.9%), unavailability of the ADR report form (60.4%), lack of knowledge of the existence of a national ADR reporting system (52.2%), and belief that the ADR in question was already well known (44.1%).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Healthcare professionals in Wuhan, China have little basic knowledge of ADR and of the voluntary reporting system. The main reasons for underreporting were lack of basic knowledge about ADRs and the voluntary reporting procedure. Education and training of healthcare professionals is needed to improve the current ADR reporting system.</p>

Expression of PTEN-encoding product in different stages of carcinogenesis and progression of gastric carcinoma / 中华肿瘤杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To illustrate the significance of expression of phosphatase and tensin homologue derived from chromosome ten (PTEN) encoding product in normal mucosa, intestinal metaplasia (IM), dysplasia and carcinoma of the stomach, and to evaluate its clinical implication in tumorigenesis and progression of gastric carcinoma.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues from 184 cases of gastric carcinoma, its adjacent normal mucosa, IM and dysplasia were evaluated for the expression of PTEN by SABC immunohistochemistry. PTEN expression was assessed as to tumor stage, lymph node metastasis, Lauren's classification and WHO histological classification of gastric carcinoma. Expression of VEGF protein was also studied in 60 cases of gastric carcinoma, with its correlation with PTEN concerned.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The positive rates of PTEN protein were 100% (102/102), 98.5% (65/66), 66.7% (4/6) and 47.8% (88/184) in normal mucosa, IM, dysplasia and carcinoma of stomach, respectively. The positive rates in the last two groups were lower than the first two (P < 0.01). PTEN was less expressed in advanced gastric carcinoma than in early ones (42.9% vs 67.6%, P < 0.01). The positive rate of PTEN protein was lower in gastric carcinoma with lymph node metastasis than without (40.3% vs 63.3%, P < 0.01). PTEN was less expressed in diffuse-type gastric carcinoma than in intestinal-type (41.5% vs 57.8%, P < 0.05). Signet ring cell carcinoma expressed PTEN stood the lowest (25.0%, 7/28), which was less than well and moderately differentiated ones (61.8%, 21/34) (P < 0.01). Expression of PTEN was inversely correlated with expression of VEGF though without any significance (P > 0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Loss or reduced expression of PTEN protein is common in carcinogenesis and progression of gastric cancer. Altered expression of PTEN may contribute to carcinogenesis and progression of gastric cancer by increasing angiogenesis, cellular adhesion and mobility and so on. PTEN may be an objective marker for pathologically biological behavior of gastric carcinoma.</p>