Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery ; (24): 928-930, 2015.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-747877

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE@#To evaluate the clinical efficacy on the treatment of the low-middle frequency sudden hearing loss with postaurical injection of methylprednisolone.@*METHOD@#The 80 cases of the low-middle frequency sudden hearing loss were randomly divided into postaurical injection and oral hormone groups. The postaurical injection group (42 cases) received the postaurical injection of methylprednisolone, 40 mg/2 d, combined with the treatment of Ginkgo dipyidamolum and Alprostadil for 14 d; The oral hormone group (38 cases) received the oral prednisone, 1 mg/kg/d, administrated once on the morning for 3 d, if effective, prolonging for another 2 d, as mentioned above for Ginkgo dipyidamolum and Alprostadil.@*RESULT@#The total effective rate was 88.10% in postaurical injection group and 86. 4o%in oral hormone group. There was no significant difference between the twbogroups( P> 0. 5).@*CONCLUSION@#Postaurical injection of methylprednisolone for the low-middle frequency sudden hearing loss is effective, safe and simple, which may be an alternative for systemic administration of gulcocorticoid.


Subject(s)
Humans , Alprostadil , Therapeutic Uses , Biological Products , Therapeutic Uses , Glucocorticoids , Therapeutic Uses , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss, Sudden , Drug Therapy , Injections , Methylprednisolone , Therapeutic Uses , Prednisone , Therapeutic Uses , Treatment Outcome
2.
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery ; (24): 819-822, 2011.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-748050

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE@#To analyze the oncological outcomes, functional outcomes in patients undergoing supracricoid partial laryngectomy (SCPL). Provide clinical experience for application of SCPL.@*METHOD@#A retrospective analysis of the 115 cases with laryngeal carcinoma accepted SCPL in our department from Jan 1996 to Dec 2004. Use the Kaplan-Meier method to analyze the patients'survival rate. Evaluate the value of reserve larynx function.@*RESULT@#The 5-years survival rates and the decannulation rate was 80.8%, 99.1% respectively; and the average decannulation time was 22.25 days. The mean time of removal of gastric tube was 9.57 days. The function of CHEP was superior to CHP. The vocal function of 115 cases were all achieved in general communication.@*CONCLUSION@#SCPL get better oncological and functional outcomes and allows the preservation of the basic function of the larynx. It's a safe, effective technique and deserved to generalization.


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Mortality , Pathology , General Surgery , Cricoid Cartilage , General Surgery , Laryngeal Neoplasms , Mortality , Pathology , General Surgery , Laryngectomy , Methods , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome
3.
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery ; (24): 100-102, 2007.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-748880

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE@#To evaluate the treatment of advanced tonsillar carcinoma by radiotherapy plus salvage surgery (R+S) or surgery coupling with postoperative radiotherapy (S+R).@*METHOD@#Clinical data of 48 patients with advanced tonsillar carcinoma who were treated in The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from June 1996 to June 2004 was retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into R+S group (group A, 21 cases) and S+R group (group B, 27 cases). Treatment outcomes were compared between these two groups. The QOL (quality of life) scale of Washington University (UW-QOL) was used to investigate the patient's quality of life.@*RESULT@#The 5-year survival rates were 42.9% in group A and 45.8% in group B, there was no significant statistical difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). Both the two treatment modalities could reduce the QOL in some degree. The average QOL score of 46 patients was 661.00 +/- 98.52 , group A was 696.09 + 90.70, while group B was 631.52 +/- 96.74, there was a significant statistical difference between the two groups (P < 0.05).@*CONCLUSION@#The two treatment modalities reached similar survivals. However, compared with the S+R, some patients who accepted treatment of R+S could avoid composite resection, reduce functional lesion and improve the QOL.


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Radiotherapy , General Surgery , Therapeutics , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Tonsillar Neoplasms , Radiotherapy , General Surgery , Therapeutics , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL