ABSTRACT
Objective@#Dynamic visual acuity (DVA) is defined as the visual acuity when there are relative movements between subjects and visual targets. The purpose of this study was to discuss the correlation between bedside DVA test and other examinations of vestibular function, and to assess the value of DVA test for clinical diagnosis.@*Methods@#Retrospective analysis of 323 cases with peripheral vestibular disorder, and analyzing the correlation between bedside DVA results and caloric test were performed.@*Results@#Out of these 323 cases, 113 cases showed positive results of DVA.Among these 113 cases with positive DVA test, 109 cases were bilateral or unilateral vestibular function loss according to the results of caloric test or VEMP. The disease with the highest positive rate of DVA was bilateral vestibulopathy(BVP), followed by vestibular neuritis (VN) and profound sudden sensorineural hearing loss (pSSNHL).@*Conclusions@#Bedside DVA is effective to determine the cases with BVP and severe unilateral vestibular function loss.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the results of TEOAE and DPOAE in the same population of normal newborns, to provide information on choosing appropriate screening tools.Methods A two-steps protocol was taken with the first screening during the first 48 to 72 hours of birth and rescreened from one to two months old if the newborns failed the first screening.For each step of screening, TEOAE and DPOAE were performed simultaneously using AccuScreen hearing screening instrument (Madsen-GN Otometrics, Taastrup, Denmark).A total of 1 062 normal newborns (F/M=508/554) delivered in Peking Union Medical College Hospital were enrolled in this research for the first screening.Infants who failed either TEOAE or DPOAE screening in the first screening were referred to a second screening.Among them, 135 performed both DPOAE and TEOAE in the second step.The newborns who failed the second screening would receive ABR when they were 3 months old.Results In the first screening,the failure rate for TEOAE was 11.0% (117/1 062) and 13.7% (145/1 062) for DPOAE.In the second screening step, the failure rates were 17.8% (24/135) and 20.7% (28/135) for TEOAE and DPOAE, respectively.Chi-square and Fisher's test showed that the failure rates of DPOAE were significant higher than TEOAE for both steps (P<0.001).The agreements between TEOAE and DPOAE were 96.0% and 95.6% for the first and second steps respectively, and the kappa values were 0.817 and 0.857.As to the average time taken to accomplish the screening for one ear, TEOAE was 24±25 s and DPOAE was 40±34 s during the first screening;in the rescreening, TEOAE was 52±41 s and DPOAE was 73±62 s.Paired-t tests showed that the differences between DPOAE and TEOAE testing time were statistically significant (P=0.000) in both screening steps.Finally, 7 newborns (10 ears) were diagnosed conductive hearing loss(except 1 ear was sensorineural hearing loss).Conclusion As a screening tool, TEOAE got lower refer rates and took less time than DPOAE implicating TEOAE a better screening tool for normal neonates.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#The purpose of this study was to report two cases of light cupulopathy, and describe the characteristics of these cases and analysis the possible physiopathological mechanisms.@*Methods@#The histories, clinical features, characteristics of nystagmus, and vestibular function, as well as audiologic results of the two patients with light cupula were analyzed.@*Results@#The two patients showed persistent geotropic direction changing positional nystagmus(DCPN)in the supine head roll tests. The null plane was present when the head was turn slightly towards affected side. Canalith repositioning maneuver was not effective. A mild sensorineural hearing loss was found on the involved ear in one patient but not in the other. The vestibular functions of two patients were abnormal.@*Conclusions@#The characteristics of nystagmus with light cupulopathy are persistent geotropic DCPN with a null plane. The clinical features are similar with the horizontal semicircular canal canalolithasis. Canalith repositioning maneuver is not recommended for its ineffectiveness.