ABSTRACT
The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score (TRS) has proven value in predicting prognosis in unstable angina/non ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) as well as in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. The TRS system has little implication, however, in the extent of myocardial damage in high-risk patients with NSTEMI. A total of 1621 patients (63.6+/-12.2 years; 1043 males) with NSTEMI were enrolled in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR). We analyzed the risk for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during a 6-month follow-up period. The TRS system showed good correlation with MACE for patients in the low and intermediate groups but had poor correlation when the high-risk group was included (p=0.128). The MACE rate was 3.8% for TRS 1, 9.4% for TRS 2, 10.7% for TRS 3, and 12.3% for TRS 4 (HR=1.29, p=0.026). Among the biomarkers and clinical risk factors, elevated N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (HR=2.61, p=0.001) and Killip class above III showed good correlation with MACE (HR=0.302, p<0.001). Therefore, we revised an alternative clinical scoring system by including these two variables that reflect left ventricular dysfunction: age > 65 years, history of ischemic heart disease, Killip class above III, and elevated pro-BNP levels above the 75th percentile. This modified scoring system, when tested for validity, showed good predictive value for MACE (HR=1.64, p<0.001). Compared with the traditional TRS, the novel alternative scoring system based on age, history of ischemic heart disease, Killip class, and NT-proBNP showed a better predictive value for 6-month MACE in high-risk patients with NSTEMI.
Subject(s)
Humans , Angina, Unstable , Biomarkers , Follow-Up Studies , Korea , Myocardial Infarction , Myocardial Ischemia , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain , Peptide Fragments , Prognosis , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score (TRS) has proven value in predicting prognosis in unstable angina/non ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) as well as in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. The TRS system has little implication, however, in the extent of myocardial damage in high-risk patients with NSTEMI. A total of 1621 patients (63.6+/-12.2 years; 1043 males) with NSTEMI were enrolled in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR). We analyzed the risk for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during a 6-month follow-up period. The TRS system showed good correlation with MACE for patients in the low and intermediate groups but had poor correlation when the high-risk group was included (p=0.128). The MACE rate was 3.8% for TRS 1, 9.4% for TRS 2, 10.7% for TRS 3, and 12.3% for TRS 4 (HR=1.29, p=0.026). Among the biomarkers and clinical risk factors, elevated N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (HR=2.61, p=0.001) and Killip class above III showed good correlation with MACE (HR=0.302, p 65 years, history of ischemic heart disease, Killip class above III, and elevated pro-BNP levels above the 75th percentile. This modified scoring system, when tested for validity, showed good predictive value for MACE (HR=1.64, p<0.001). Compared with the traditional TRS, the novel alternative scoring system based on age, history of ischemic heart disease, Killip class, and NT-proBNP showed a better predictive value for 6-month MACE in high-risk patients with NSTEMI.
Subject(s)
Humans , Angina, Unstable , Biomarkers , Follow-Up Studies , Korea , Myocardial Infarction , Myocardial Ischemia , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain , Peptide Fragments , Prognosis , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The current guidelines recommend an early invasive strategy for patients suffering with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). However, there is still debate about the timing of revascularization in patients with NSTEMI. To analyze the clinical efficacy of the timing of revascularization, we compared the in-hospital clinical outcome of NSTEMI patients from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR) between the early and selective invasive therapeutic groups. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Between Nov. 2005 and Apr. 2007, 2762 acute NSTEMI patients (mean age=64.6+/-12.8 years, 1847 males) were enrolled in the KAMIR. The therapeutic strategy of NSTEMI was categorized into early invasive treatment (within 48 hours, Group I mean age: 63.1+/-13.1 years, 1085 males) and selective invasive treatment (Group II mean age: 66.5+/-12.1 years, 762 males). The initial clinical status and the in-hospital mortality and morbidity rate were compared between these two groups. The in-hospital outcomes were also compared between the two groups according to each level of the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score. RESULTS: There were significant differences in the mortality and morbidity rate between the groups (6.5% vs. 10.3%, respectively, p<0.001). According to TIMI risk score, there were no significant differences of mortality and morbidity for the low to moderate risk patients (5.3% vs. 7.8%, respectively, p=0.123 for the risk score 0-2, 6.4% vs. 8.7%, p=0.139 for the risk score 3-4). CONCLUSION: Early invasive treatment improves the hospital outcome for the high-risk NSTEMI patients. The use of abciximab, a low ejection fraction, a high Killip class, a high TIMI risk score and old age are the predictive factors of in-hospital mortality and morbidity.