ABSTRACT
Background@#Three-dimensional (3D)-printed customized implants can be fabricated and utilized for all bones with massive bone defects. The main safety issues with 3D-printed implants made of Ti6Al4V alloy are related to the release of metal debris and residual powder. In this study, we investigated the perioperative titanium concentrations in whole blood and peri-implant fluid samples of patients who underwent limb salvage surgery with a 3D-printed Ti6Al4V implant. @*Methods@#Nineteen patients who underwent limb salvage surgery with 3D-printed Ti6Al4V implants were divided into two groups:the serial samples group and the follow-up group. To observe metal distribution and clearance in the body, serial samples of blood and peri-implant fluid from the surgical drain were prospectively collected for five patients in the serial samples group. For the remaining 14 patients who were followed up for more than a year, blood samples were collected only once. @*Results@#In the serial samples group, the mean baseline titanium concentration was 0.78 μg/L (range, 0.1–2.2 μg/L): 3 patients showed peak concentration before the third postoperative month, while 2 patients still showed an increasing pattern at this point.Total titanium mass in the surgical drain showed a wash-out phenomenon in a week, with a significant uniform decrease (p = 0.04).In 14 patients in the follow-up group, the mean titanium concentration in the whole blood was 10.8 μg/L (range, 0.3–36.6 μg/L). For the 14 patients with a long-term follow-up, the aluminum and vanadium concentrations were all negligible. @*Conclusions@#Whole blood titanium concentrations were higher after surgery using 3D-printed implants than after that using conventional orthopedic implants, but markedly lower than in patients with implant failure. None of the patients developed serious clinical adverse effects during follow-up.
ABSTRACT
Purpose@#Splenectomy for patients with remnant gastric cancer has been controversial. The purpose of this study is to identify the impact of splenectomy in the treatment of remnant gastric cancer. @*Methods@#We retrospectively analyzed 285 patients with remnant gastric cancer who underwent completion total gastrectomy with or without splenectomy in Samsung Medical Center, between September 1996 and December 2017. We used a 1:1 propensity score matching method for the analysis. The matching factors were age, sex, and pathologic stage. After the matching process, we compared the 5-year overall survival (OS) and the disease-free survival (DFS) between patients with and without splenectomy during completion total gastrectomy. @*Results@#The median duration of follow-up was 58.0 months (range, 0–132 months). After propensity score matching, there were no statistically significant differences between the splenectomy group (n = 77) and no splenectomy group (n = 77) in terms of clinicopathological features. The 5-year OS rate between the no splenectomy and splenectomy group were not significantly different. There was no significant difference between 5-year DFS of the matched groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that splenectomy is not a significant prognostic factor in terms of 5-year OS (no splenectomy vs. splenectomy; 61.5% vs. 60.2%, P = 0.884) or DFS (74.9% vs. 69.8%, P = 0.880). @*Conclusion@#Splenectomy has no impact on the OS and DFS in patients with remnant gastric cancer. Splenectomy during completion total gastrectomy may not be necessary.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Preoperative endoscopic clipping is a popular method in identifying the location of tumors during total laparoscopic or robotic gastrectomy. We investigated the usefulness of additional intraoperative abdominal radiographs to identify the location of clips.METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 331 patients with early gastric cancer who underwent endoscopic clipping before total laparoscopic or robotic gastrectomy between September 2012 and September 2018. Endoscopists applied two clips 1 cm from the proximal aspect of the upper margin of the tumor which was located above the angle of the stomach. We compared outcomes of patients who underwent preoperative abdominal radiographs only (group A) and those who underwent additional abdominal radiographs (group B).RESULTS: Of the total patients, 80 (24.2%) underwent additional intraoperative abdominal radiographs. The rates of positive frozen biopsy in the two groups were not significantly different (group A vs. group B: 2.8% vs. 3.8%, P=0.456). The additional resection rate was significantly higher in group B compared to group A (8.8% vs. 2.8%, P=0.048). The mean distance from the tumor was 3.3 cm (±2.4) in group A and 2.4 cm (±1.3) in group B (P<0.001). Large tumor size (≥2.4 cm) was significantly associated with additional resection (odds ratio, 5.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.17–26.30; P=0.031).CONCLUSION: Additional intraoperative abdominal radiographs may be unnecessary for confirmation of proximal resection margin, if the resection line can be predetermined with preoperative abdominal radiographs. For large tumors, to avoid additional resection, the resection line should be placed 1 cm or more proximally from the preoperatively applied clips.