Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2016; 32 (2): 356-360
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-178646

ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine diagnostic yield of Closed Pleural Biopsy [CPB] and Cytology in Exudative Pleural Effusion [PE]


Methods: This prospective comparative study was conducted at Chest Unit-II and Medical Unit-IV of Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi Pakistan from January 2011 till December 2014


Results: Ninety-four patients with exudative PE were finally included. The mean age [SD] was 44.0 [13.8] years. Overall Specific Diagnosis was reached in 76/94 patients; 46 Tuberculosis PE [TPE] and 30 Malignant PE [MPE]. CPB diagnosed all TPE patients alone and 28/30 of MPE. Cytology diagnosed only 10/30 patients of MPE with 8 patients having both CPB and Cytology positive for malignancy whereas in the remaining two cases only Cytology positive. The sensitivity of CPB in detecting TPE and MPE was 93.9% and 82.4% respectively whereas specificity for both was 100%. The diagnostic yield of cytology in detecting MPE is only [33.3%]. The diagnostic yield of CPB for TPE and MPE is 100% and 93.3% respectively. The overall specific diagnostic yield of CPB is 78.7%


Conclusion: CPB is better than pleural fluid cytology alone with the later adding little to diagnostic yield when both combined in distinguishing TPE from MPE, the two main differential of exudative PE in a TBEndemic country

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL