clinical manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus in Pakistan correlate with rest of Asia?

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [SLE] is known to be different among people with different racial, geographical and socio-economic back grounds. Asia has diverse ethnic groups broadly, Orientals in the East and Southeast Asia, Indians in South Asia and Arabs in the Middle East. These regions differ significantly from the Caucasians with reference to SLE. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to delineate the clinical pattern and disease course in Pakistani patients with SLE and compare it with Asian data. Patients with SLE fulfilling the clinical and laboratory criteria of the American Rheumatism Association admitted at the Aga Khan University Hospital between 1986 and 2001 were studied by means of a retrospective review of their records. The results were compared with various studies in different regions of Asia. Demographically, it was seen that SLE is a disease predominantly of females in their third decade, which is generally consistent with Asian data. There was less cutaneous manifestations, arthritis, serositis, haematological and renal involvement compared to various regions in Asia. The neurological manifestations of SLE, however, place Pakistani patients in the middle of a spectrum between South Asians and other Asian races. This study has shown that the clinical characteristics of SLE patients in our country may be different to those of other Asian races. Although our population is similar to South Asians, but clinical manifestations of our SLE patients are considerably different, suggesting some unknown etiology. Further studies are required to confirm the above results and to find statistically sounder associations

Clinico-laboratory findings in male lupus patients from a tertiary care hospital, Pakistan

This study was conducted to delineate the clinical pattern of a cohort of Pakistani male patients with systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE]. Clinical and laboratory data were collected of 24 male patients who were diagnosed with SLE and admitted to a tertiary care hospital between 1986 and 2001. Imaging and invasive studies [including aspirations and biopsies] were also recorded. Fourteen patients [58%] had renal involvement, with WHO class 4 and 5 comprising 89% of the cases. Eight patients [33%] had neurological involvement. Out of these 8 patients, 3 presented with psychosis [12.5%] and 4 [17%] with seizures. Twenty three patients [96%] had hematological involvement, 6 [25%] had serosal and 10 [41%] had articular involvement. Cutaneous lesions were noted in 10 [41%] patients. A majority of the patients were noncompliant and were lost to follow-up; therefore, ultimate outcome could not be clearly delineated. A high index of suspicion for SLE in males may permit early diagnosis and dictate the need for more aggressive therapy

Ischemic monomelic neuropathy: a complication of vascular access procedure

Ischemic monomelic neuropathy [IMN] is an infrequently recognized type of ischemic neuropathy produced by shunting of blood or due to acute noncompressive occlusion of the major proximal limb artery. Most reports about this complication appear in the neurology literature. IMN predominantly occurs in diabetic patients with evidence of peripheral neuropathy and atherosclerotic peripheral vascular disease. We report a case of ischemic monomelic neuropathy occurring in a patient with end stage diabetic nephropathy following PTFE [polytetrafluoroethylene] graft placement in proximal upper limb for chronic maintenance hemodialysis