ABSTRACT
Objective: In many medical institutions in Japan, 10% lidocaine gel is prepared as an in-hospital formulation to treat intractable neuropathic pain. Clinical studies have reported the short-term efficacy of topical lidocaine therapy for neuropathic pain, while there are few reports in real-world practice. To clarify the clinical usage and its usefulness, in this study, we investigated the duration of use, amount, effectiveness, and safety of 10% lidocaine gel.Design: We conducted a retrospective study investigating the actual usage of 10% lidocaine gel using electronic medical records.Methods: This study included 74 patients treated with 10% lidocaine gel in Kyoto University Hospital between July 2019 and January 2022. Information about disease (purpose of use), concomitant medications and other background information of the patients were collected. In addition, the duration of use, amount, adverse events, and discontinuation of 10% lidocaine gel were investigated. Effectiveness was determined by physician interviews and the pain visual analogue scale (VAS).Results: Ten percent lidocaine gel was used primarily to treat postherpetic neuralgia and, in some cases, other types of chronic pain for a median duration of use of 3.2 months (0.03-118.5). Pain relief was achieved in 73.3% of patients according to physician interviews, with a significant decrease in the VAS score. Although adverse events were observed in 12 patients (16.2%), including skin problems (12.2%), paralysis (4.1%), and somnolence (1.4%), eight patients continued to use 10% lidocaine gel after their occurrence. Three patients discontinued it due to adverse events, and their symptoms subsequently improved thereafter.Conclusion: The present results suggest that 10% lidocaine gel is effective and safe even when used for a long-time. Although this is a single-center study, it is the first systematic investigation of real-world usage of an in-hospital formulation of 10% lidocaine gel and is expected to assist clinical practice and drug development.
ABSTRACT
Objective: In patients with specific backgrounds, comprehensive identification of health problems and proactive pharmacist intervention are crucial to providing safe and effective medical care. However, there are insufficient reports on chemotherapy regimen selection and supportive care management in patients taking immunosuppressants. In this study, to circumvent adverse events, pharmacists intervened with a patient administering tacrolimus (TAC) using known information, focusing on multiple factors attributable to the patient in addition to drug interactions.Methods: The patient was a male in their 70s who received palliative chemotherapy for gastric cancer during their dermatomyositis treatment with TAC. Pharmaceutical support for cancer chemotherapy was provided using the following four procedures: (1) Patient information was collected from interviews and electronic medical records to identify patient-specific problems; (2) Basic pharmacological information was collected from tertiary sources, focusing on the interaction between TAC and aprepitant (APR). Furthermore, clinical reports were collected, and the pharmacokinetic drug interaction significance classification system was used for quantitative predictions; (3) The information obtained in steps 1) and 2) was evaluated, and comprehensive proposals linked to the patient information were presented; (4) Adverse events, TAC blood level, and patient outcomes were monitored after treatment initiation.Results: A chemotherapy regimen consisting of S-1/oxaliplatin therapy without APR was selected. The adverse effects were controllable, and the treatment was completed without many adverse events. Meanwhile, TAC adherence was unaffected by cancer chemotherapy, and the TAC blood concentration or dose ratios were controlled within the same range as previously reported.Conclusion: In cancer chemotherapy, for cases with limited evidence or information, comprehensive pharmaceutical support was provided using known patient information, considering multiple patient factors. This report is beneficial as an example of supportive care management by a pharmacist and contributes to providing optimal service in cases with specific backgrounds.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to elucidate the efficacy and safety of carbonate apatite (CO₃Ap) granules in 2-stage sinus floor augmentation through the radiographic and histomorphometric assessment of bone biopsy specimens.METHODS: Two-stage sinus floor augmentation was performed on 13 patients with a total of 17 implants. Radiographic assessment using panoramic radiographs was performed immediately after augmentation and was also performed 2 additional times, at 7±2 months and 18±2 months post-augmentation, respectively. Bone biopsy specimens taken from planned implant placement sites underwent micro-computed tomography, after which histological sections were prepared.RESULTS: Postoperative healing of the sinus floor augmentation was uneventful in all cases. The mean preoperative residual bone height was 3.5±1.3 mm, and this was increased to 13.3±1.7 mm by augmentation with the CO₃Ap granules. The mean height of the augmented site had decreased to 10.7±1.9 mm by 7±2 months after augmentation; however, implants with lengths in the range of 6.5 to 11.5 mm could still be placed. The mean height of the augmented site had decreased to 9.6±1.4 mm by 18±2 months post-augmentation. No implant failure or complications were observed. Few inflammatory cells or foreign body giant cells were observed in the bone biopsy specimens. Although there were individual differences in the amount of new bone detected, new bone was observed to be in direct contact with the CO₃Ap granules in all cases, without an intermediate layer of fibrous tissue. The amounts of bone and residual CO₃Ap were 33.8%±15.1% and 15.3%±11.9%, respectively.CONCLUSIONS: In this first demonstration, low-crystalline CO₃Ap granules showed excellent biocompatibility, and bone biopsy showed them to be replaced with bone in humans. CO₃Ap granules are a useful and safe bone substitute for two-stage sinus floor augmentation.