Effects of a workshop for clinical clerkships at The Jikei University / 医学教育

Background: A workshop for training clinical clerkship staff has been held since 2009. We examined how the participants felt about the workshop.<br>Method: The questionnaire was sent to the participants of the workshop.<br>Result: Of the participants, 82％ thought that the workshop was helpful and that the benefits had continued for more than 2 years. Their motivation for undergraduate medical education was improved. They started to consider how medical students become members of a medical team and to think about the goals of medical practice. To promote further increases in the numbers of clinical clerkships, the participants cited the necessity of increasing the number of faculty advisors, encouraging medical students’ positive attitudes, changing attitudes about patients, extending the training period, and holding such workshops.<br>Conclusion: The workshop was beneficial for the staff, and the beneficial effects continued long after the workshop was held.

Assessment of a System for Evaluating Pulse and Blood Pressure Measurement Skills in the Objective Structured Clinical Examination / 医学教育

Purpose: To assess problems of a system for evaluating educational methods which cause interevaluator variability at the pulse and blood pressure measurement station of the objective structured clinical examination. Subjects: 186 evaluations for 93 fourth-year medical students. Method: The vital-sign station consists of pulse examination, blood pressure measurement, and a 1-minute oral examination. To assess interevaluator reliability, the differences between two evaluations of each of 15 evaluation steps were calculated and divided into three categories: “greater than 95% agreement, ” “unidirectional disagreement, ” and “bidirectional disagreement.” Results: The steps of “consent to examination, ” “proper verbal instructions, ” “valve release, ” “estimation by palpation”, a question about “normal systolic blood pressure, ” and a question about “the interval and the number of repetitions” showed greater than 95% agreement. The steps of “manner of speaking, ” “palpation of peripheral pulse, ” “stethoscope placement, ” “cuff deflation, ” “presentation of blood pressure, ” and a question about “absolute arrhythmia” showed unidirectional disagreement. The steps of “presentation of pulse measurement, ” “cuff wrapping, ” and “cuff inflation” showed bidirectional disagreement. Discussion: Suggestions to improve intervaluator reliability include:(1) decreasing the evaluation steps to two with a single checkpoint, (2) presenting blood pressure with the palpation method, (3) deleting the oral examination, (4) providing adequate instruction about the differences in the types of cuffs and bladders, and (5) clarifying evaluation criteria and the training of evaluators.