Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Indian Pediatr ; 2022 Sept; 59(9): 692-698
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-225367

ABSTRACT

Background: Urine specific gravity reflects hydration status and correlates well with urine osmolality. Objective: To compare intravenous fluid therapy guided with and without inclusion of urine specific gravity to the standard parameters for maintaining postnatal weight loss within permissible limits in neonates admitted to the intensive care unit. Methods: An open-label randomized controlled trial was conducted, including neonates requiring intravenous fluids for ?72 hours, randomized into the study (urine specific gravity guided fluids) and control arms. The outcomes of the study were to determine proportion of neonates with weight loss within permissible limits, mean percentage weight loss and number of days to reach maximum weight loss. Results: 80 preterm and term neonates (40 in each arm) were enrolled. A comparable proportion of neonates had weight loss within permissible limits in study arm and in control arms [39 (97.5%) vs 36 (90%); P=0.165]. The (mean (SD) percentage weight loss was significantly less in the study arm compared to control arm [All neonates: 7.2(2.6) vs 9.3(3.5); P=0.004); preterm neonates: 7.7 (2.8) vs 11 (3.9); P=0.008)]. Preterm neonates in the study arm attained nadir weight significantly earlier than in the controls (P=0.03) and attained complete enteral feeding earlier. Urine specific gravity showed a moderate negative correlation with the percentage weight loss. Conclusion: Using urine specific gravity to regulate intravenous fluids in neonates resulted in a significant reduction in postnatal weight loss, especially in preterm neonates

2.
J Biosci ; 1985 Aug; 8(3&4): 757-766
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-160464

ABSTRACT

Investigations that are being carried out in various laboratories including ours clearly provide the answer which is in the negative. Only the direct evidences obtained in this laboratory will be presented and discussed. It has been unequivocally shown that the interaction between 16S and 23S RNAs plays the primary role in the association of ribosomal subunits. Further, 23S RNA is responsible for the binding of 5S RNA to 16S.23S RNA complex with the help of three ribosomal proteins, L5, L18, L15/L25. The 16S.23S RNA complex is also capable of carrying out the following ribosomal functions, although to small but significant extents, with the help of a very limited number of ribosomal proteins and the factors involved in protein synthesis: (a) poly U-binding, (b) poly U-dependent binding of phenylalanyl tRNA, (c) EF-G-dependent GTPase activity, (d) initiation complex formation, (e) peptidyl transferase activity (puromycin reaction) and (f) polyphenylalanine synthesis. These results clearly indicate the direct involvement of rRNAs in the various steps of protein synthesis. Very recently it has been demonstrated that the conformational change of 23S RNA is responsible for the translocation of peptidyl tRNA from the aminoacyl (A) site to the peptidyl (Ρ) site. A model has been proposed for translocation on the basis of direct experimental evidences. The new concept that ribosomal RNAs are the functional components in ribosomes and proteins act as control switches may eventually turn out to be noncontroversial.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL