Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Medical Education ; : 239-246, 2002.
Article in Japanese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-369804

ABSTRACT

A tutorial education system for medical students was introduced at Kinki University in 1998. To evaluate the efficacy and to identify problems of the system, questionnaires were given to both students and tutors. Many students (approximately 80%) enjoyed the system and felt that tutorial lectures were effective. Many students believed that their selflearning time had increased and that they had developed the ability to think scientifically. However, they also thought that the material for tutorials was insufficient and that some tutors lacked teaching ability. Tutors thought that students had developed motivation (52%), problem-solving ability (58%), and debating skills (77%). Tutors also pointed out several problems, e.g., that some students had not developed self-leaning ability. Also, some tutors were poorly motivated. These findings suggest that we need to improve tutorial materials and the quality of tutors as well as fostering the self-learning ability of students.

2.
Medical Education ; : 247-256, 2001.
Article in Japanese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-369774

ABSTRACT

Kinki University School of Medicine introduced clerkships for undergraduate clinical training in 1999. Clinical clerkships are performed for the first 8 weeks of the sixth academic year. In 1999 and 2000 we conducted questionnaire surveys asking students about this system. The teaching staff encourages students to participate extensively in clinical situations, which reflects the consensus about this system. We also performed similar surveys of nurses and teaching staff. Clinical clerkships did not increase the incidence of problems between patients and medical staff. Many students felt their motivation to be a physician was increased. Although the findings of these questionnaire surveys indicate that our clerkship system works successfully, they also revealed some problems for sixth-year students. Although we recognize the significance of this system for undergraduate clinical training, further improvement is required.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL