Intradetrusor Injections of Onabotulinum Toxin-A in Children With Urinary Incontinence due to Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity Refractory to Antimuscarinic Treatment

PURPOSE: This was a prospective single-arm study to assess the efficacy and safety of intradetrusor injections of onabotulinum toxin-A in children with urinary incontinence associated with neurogenic detrusor overactivity due to myelomeningocele. All patients had failed the first-line treatment of a combination of oral antimuscarinics and intermittent catheterization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study group consisted of 31 children with myelomeningocele with a mean age of 7.95 years (range, 5-3 years) who were followed up for a mean of 29 weeks. The amount of onabotulinum toxin A injected was 10 U/kg with a maximal dose of 300 U. There were 20 to 30 injection sites with rigid cystoscopic guidance under general anesthesia. RESULTS: Thirty of 31 patients reported dryness between intermittent catheterization intervals. The mean reduction in maximum detrusor pressure and the mean increase in maximum cystometric capacity from baseline were 53% and 51.5%, respectively, 6 weeks after injection. We found a 324% increase in mean bladder compliance and a 57% increase in mean intermittent catheterization volumes. The mean duration of efficacy was 28 weeks with a single injection and 36 weeks for repeated injections (minimum, 16 weeks; maximum, 52 weeks). The mean time interval between repeated onabotulinum toxin-A injections was 7 months (maximum, 13 months). Intradetrusor injections of onabotulinum toxin-A were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Onabotulinum toxin-A injections into the bladder wall provide a significant symptomatic and urodynamic improvement in children with neurogenic detrusor overactivity due to myelomeningocele who are on intermittent catheterization. The treatment seems to be safe and very well tolerated.

Management of Complications After Tension-Free Midurethral Slings

Since their introduction in 1996, tension-free midurethral slings (MUS) have been proven to have long-term efficacy and safety. They are considered the gold standard treatment of female stress urinary incontinence, especially in cases that are associated with urethral hypermobility. However, they are not free of complications and, although rare, some of these complications can be challenging for both patients and physicians. Some complications occur intraoperatively, whereas others appear in the early or late postoperative period. There is less controversy in the diagnosis and treatment of complications such as vaginal extrusion or urinary system erosion, whereas de novo voiding problems are at best not completely understood. Voiding dysfunction after MUS placement may vary in a wide range from urinary frequency or urgency to retention and is usually attributed to the obstructive or irritative effect of the sling. However, present urodynamic criteria for the diagnosis of female infravesical obstruction are not satisfactory, and the best management policy for de novo voiding dysfunction remains controversial. In the majority of cases, the diagnosis of obstruction leading to a urethral release surgery depends on a combination of several clinical findings. The timing of urethral release surgery varies depending on the preferences of the surgeon, and the outcome of this surgery is not always predictable. The purpose of this review was to assess the diagnosis and management of the immediate, short-term, and long-term complications of MUS in light of the current literature in an attempt to determine the best management policy.

The Effect of Asymptomatic Urethral Caruncle on Micturition in Women with Urinary Incontinence

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of asymptomatic urethral caruncle (UC) on micturition in women suffering from urinary incontinence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 232 patients participated in the study. UC was diagnosed in 50 of 232 patients with urinary incontinence during a physical examination in our clinic. All cases were divided into 2 groups: UC combined with urinary incontinence (group 1) and urinary incontinence only (group 2). Urodynamic evaluations were performed according to the International Continence Society standards. RESULTS: Both groups were similar in terms of voiding diary, pad test and residual urine volume. Urodynamic studies revealed no significant difference between group 1 and 2 (infravesical obstruction: 6% vs. 4.4%; overactive detrusor: 44% vs. 42.9% respectively). The rates of severe IPSS (37.8% vs. 20.9%) and severe cystocele (20.9% vs. 13.8%) were numerically higher in group 1 with no statistically significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that there is no effect of asymptomatic UC on lower urinary tract symptoms in women with urinary incontinence. Therefore, treating asymptomatic UC is unnecessary in these patients. However, during incontinence surgery, it is the surgeon's decision whether to treat asymptomatic UC.