Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
2.
The Korean Journal of Critical Care Medicine ; : 145-150, 2011.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-650663

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Location of the tip of a central venous catheter (CVC) within the pericardium has been associated with potentially lethal cardiac tamponade. The purpose of this study was to show the relationship between the height of patients and the depth of CVC. METHODS: We enrolled 262 adult patients into this study. All patients were divided to three groups according to the height; Group S, M and L. Central venous catheterization was performed through the right subclavian vein and the CVC was fixed at the depth of 15 cm from the skin. The distance between the CVC tips and the carina was measured by chest X-ray and was analyzed. RESULTS: The mean (SD) tip position placed via the right subclavian vein was 0.04 (1.6) cm above the carina; Group S, 0.01 (1.8) above the carina, Group M, 0.16 (1.4) above the carina, and Group L, 0.16 (1.8) below the carina. CVC locations could be predicted with a margin of error between 3.1 cm below the carina and 3.2 cm above the carina in 95% of patients. There was no significance difference among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between the height of patient and the depth of CVC was low. Because many of the CVC tips were positioned below the carina regardless the height of patients on routine 15 cm-length method, it is recommended not to use the routine 15 cm method with right subclavian CVC placement as far as possible.


Subject(s)
Adult , Humans , Cardiac Tamponade , Catheterization , Catheterization, Central Venous , Central Venous Catheters , Pericardium , Skin , Subclavian Vein , Thorax
3.
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology ; : 429-432, 2010.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-44821

ABSTRACT

A 46-year-old woman underwent a right thyroidectomy with left neck dissection under general anesthesia. The operation was performed successfully for over the course of 3 hours 30 minutes. After extubation, the patient was transferred to post-anesthetic care unit (PACU). After 10 minutes, dyspnea, chest discomfort, desaturation was suddenly occurred. Intubation was performed in PACU. The emergency chest X-ray revealed a right pneumothorax, and the patient was treated by chest tube insertion. The patient was improved and was discharged uneventfully from hospital 8 days later.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Anesthesia, General , Chest Tubes , Dyspnea , Emergencies , Intubation , Neck , Neck Dissection , Pneumothorax , Thorax , Thyroidectomy
4.
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology ; : 704-708, 2009.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-212859

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hypothermia following the induction of anesthesia is caused by core to peripheral redistribution of body heat. It has been reported that propofol causes more severe hypothermia than sevoflurane by inhibiting thermoregulatory vasoconstriction during surgical procedures. Therefore, we evaluated the induction and maintenance of anesthesia with intravenous propofol to determine if it causes more core hypothermia than inhaled sevoflurane. METHODS: Forty-five patients who underwent hysterectomy were divided into two groups randomly, a propofol-remifentanil (PR) anesthesia group and a sevoflurane-remifentanil (SR) anesthesia group. Each group was subjected to anesthetic induction with either 1.5 mg/kg propofol or inhalation of 5% sevoflurane, respectively. Anesthesia in the former group was maintained with propofol while it was maintained with sevoflurane in the latter group. Specifically, 6-10 mg/kg/hr propofol, 3 L/min medical air, 2 L/min O2, and 0.25 mg/kg/hr remifentanil were used in the PR group for maintenance, while 1.5 vol% sevoflurane, 3 L/min medical air, 2 L/min O2 and 0.25 mg/kg/hr remifentanil were used for maintenance in the SR group. We measured the core temperature 8 times, prior to induction and 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, 75 and 90 minutes after induction. RESULTS: Core temperatures decreased in both the PR and SR group during surgical operation, but there was no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Anesthesia induced and maintained by propofol did not cause a greater degree of hypothermia than sevoflurane.


Subject(s)
Humans , Anesthesia , Hot Temperature , Hypothermia , Hysterectomy , Inhalation , Methyl Ethers , Piperidines , Propofol , Vasoconstriction
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL