ABSTRACT
Background: Hospital waste management [HWM] rules in Pakistan were issued in 2005. Despite a decade of enactment, adherence to HWM 2005 rules has been inconsistent and systematic assessment of adherence using a World Health Organization [WHO]-recommended questionnaire has not been done in all teaching hospitals of Peshawar District.
Aims: This study assessed the adherence to HWM 2005 rules by tertiary care teaching hospitals of Peshawar District with respect to HWM personnel, policy and practices.
Methods: Pretested structured questionnaires based on WHO recommendations were used to survey all teaching hospitals of Peshawar District from January to March 2015. Data were also collected on HWM infrastructure and processes from 1 randomly selected medical, surgical, paediatric, and obstetrics/gynaecology unit in each hospital. Besides descriptive statistics, public and private hospitals were compared using Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.
Results: Most surveyed hospitals lacked formal HWM plans [70%], written procedures [80%], related job descriptions [80%] or records [90%]. Many hospitals neither had trained HWM supervisors [56%] nor did they organize formal HWM trainings for new staff [40%]. None of the hospitals followed waste segregation and colour coding. When compared to national HWM 2005 rules, multiple gaps in appropriate transportation, storage and disposal were found with no statistically significant difference between public and private hospitals.
Conclusions: Serious gaps in adherence to HWM 2005 rules exist in surveyed hospitals. With recent devolution of environmental function, the Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa should enact provincial HWM rules [and ensure their implementation] to facilitate effective HWM practice across provincial healthcare facilities
Subject(s)
Medical Waste , Materials Management, Hospital , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Background: Pakistan has recently observed a significant growth in public health education programmes. Little is known about the structure of these programmes nor whether they are adequately responsive to national health system needs.
Aims: We reviewed existing public health degree programmes in Pakistan along with an exploration of the national public health market and health system needs.
Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted between January 2015 and March 2016. Seventeen public health degree programmes were reviewed for programmatic and instructional attributes. Thirteen key-informant interviews were conducted to explore health system needs and challenges related to public health workforce.
Results: We found substantial variation in public health academic programmes in terms of offered courses, credit hours, number of faculty and tuition costs. About 70% of public health degree programmes were generic [i.e. with no specific concentration track] and only 18% offered practicums. Overall median tuition cost in 2016 was US$ 10 350. During key-informant interviews, emerged themes for challenges included lack of practical public health skills, limited knowledge of latest theoretical principles, poor communication skills and insufficient IT orientation. Identified themes about knowledge and skills areas to address future public health challenges of Pakistan included system thinking mind set, healthcare IT skills, and leadership and management skills.
Conclusions: Public health education in Pakistan falls short of meeting current national challenges. Pakistan needs a national public health accreditation body for regulating education, harmonizing global standards to local context and developing relevant career pathways