ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Background: The role of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) in preventing the development of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) and whether there is a difference between the results of applications of RIPC to the upper or lower extremities has not been adequately demonstrated. Methods: We included the patients who underwent coronary angiography due to stable angina pectoris in this single center, randomized, pilot study. We randomly enrolled a total of 168 patients in one of three groups (60 patients in the upper limb RIPC group, 58 patients in the lower limb RIPC group, and 50 patients in the control group). Results: According to the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN), CIN did not develop in any RIPC patients and developed in 6% of controls (OR: 3.511, 95% CI: 2.757-4.471, p=0.025). According to the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines, CIN developed in 1.7% of RIPC patients and 8% of controls (p=0.065). It was found that creatinine levels increased in the control group and decreased in the RIPC groups (baseline: 0.81±0.19mg/dL and 0.86±0.25mg/dL and control: 0.76±0.17mg/dL and 0.91±0.36mg/ dL, p <0.001). When the upper and lower limb RIPC results were compared, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of CIN. In multivariate analyses we found out that baseline eGFR, baseline mean blood pressure, contrast agent volume, and RIPC were independently associated with the development of CIN. Conclusions: RIPC is a practically useful method in preventing CIN in patients undergoing coronary angiography. Upper or lower-limb RIPC applications seem to have a similar effect.
RESUMEN No se ha demostrado adecuadamente el papel del preacondicionamiento isquémico remoto (RIPC) en la prevención del desarrollo de nefropatía inducida por contraste (NIC) y si existe una diferencia entre los resultados de las aplicaciones de RIPC en las extremidades superiores o inferiores. Se incluyó a los pacientes sometidos a coronariografía por angina de pecho estable en este estudio piloto, aleatorizado, unicéntrico. Inscribimos al azar a un total de 168 pacientes en uno de los tres grupos (60 pacientes en el grupo de RIPC de miembros superiores, 58 pacientes en el grupo de RIPC de miembros inferiores, 50 pacientes en el grupo de control). De acuerdo con la Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN), NIC no se desarrolló en ningún paciente con RIPC y se desarrolló en el 6% de los controles (OR: 3,511, IC del 95%: 2,757-4,471, p = 0,025). Según las directrices de la Sociedad Europea de Radiología Urogenital (ESUR), la NIC se desarrolló en el 1,7% de los pacientes con RIPC y en el 8% de los controles (p = 0,065). Se encontró que los niveles de creatinina aumentaron en el grupo de control y disminuyeron en los grupos de RIPC (línea de base: 0,81 ± 0,19 mg / dL y 0,86 ± 0,25 mg / dL y control: 0,76 ± 0,17 mg / dL y 0,91 ± 0,36 mg / dL, p <0,001). Cuando se compararon los resultados de RIPC de miembros superiores e inferiores, no hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas en la incidencia de NIC. En análisis multivariado descubrimos que la TFGe basal, la presión arterial media basal, el volumen del agente de contraste y la RIPC se asociaron de forma independiente con el desarrollo de NIC. La RIPC es un método prácticamente útil en la prevención de NIC en pacientes sometidos a coronariografía. Las aplicaciones de RIPC de miembros superiores o inferiores parecen tener un efecto similar.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Poor recognition and monitoring of nutritional status is the most important cause of malnutrition in hospitalized patients. The aim of this study was to assess the nutritional status of a group of patients and compare the results with their serum prealbumin levels. METHODS: Ninety-seven patients admitted consecutively to the hospital were enrolled in the study. The risk of malnutrition was assessed according to anthropometric data and the Subjective Global Assessment and Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 tools. The nutritional statuses of the patients were compared with their age, gender, body mass index, medical history, weight loss and routine biochemical analyses, including prealbumin and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: According to the Nutrition Risk Screening 2002, 57 percent of the patients were malnourished or at risk of malnutrition, correlating well with the Subjective Global Assessment (p<0.001, r=0.700). Multivariate analysis revealed positive correlations between malnutrition and age, weight loss, malignancy and serum C-reative protein (p=0.046, p=0.001, p=0.04 and p=0.002). Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 score ³3 was associated with prolonged length of hospital stay (p=0.001). Serum prealbumin correlated with nutritional status, regardless of the number of chronic diseases and inflammation biomarkers (p=0.01). Serum prealbumin sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic value in the assessment of risk of malnutrition were 94 percent, 32 percent, 0.67, 0.78 and 69 respectively. After 7 days of nutritional support, the risk of malnutrition decreased by 12 percent (p<0.001) and serum prealbumin levels increased by 20 percent (p=0.003). CONCLUSION: Instead of reflecting overall nutritional status, low serum prealbumin may be regarded as a sign of increased risk of malnutrition, requiring further nutritional assessment. It can be used for monitoring patients receiving nutritional support.
OBJETIVO: Falha no reconhecimento e acompanhamento do estado nutricional é a razão mais importante da desnutrição em pacientes hospitalizados. Este estudo objetivou avaliar o estado nutricional dos pacientes e comparar os resultados com os níveis séricos de pré-albumina. MÉTODOS: Foram incluídos 97 pacientes no estudo, internados consecutivamente. O risco de desnutrição foi avaliado de acordo com dados antropométricos e com a Avaliação Subjetiva Global e Triagem de Risco Nutricional 2002. Os estados nutricionais dos pacientes foram comparados com suas idades, sexo, índice de massa corporal, histórico médico, perda de peso e análises bioquímicas, incluindo pré-albumina e tempo de permanência hospitalar. RESULTADOS: De acordo com o Triagem de Risco Nutricional 2002, 57 por cento dos pacientes estavam desnutridos ou em risco de desnutrição, apresentando boa correlação com o Avaliação Subjetiva Global (p<0,001, r=0,700). A análise multivariada mostrou correlações positivas entre desnutrição e idade, perda de peso, malignidade e proteína reativa-C (p=0,046, p=0,001, p=0,04 e p=0,002). Um escore ³3 no Triagem de Risco Nutricional 2002 foi associado à internação prolongada (p<0,001). Houve correlação entre pré-albumina sérica e o estado nutricional, independente do número de doenças crônicas e biomarcadores de inflamação (p=0,01). CONCLUSÃO: Ao invés de refletir o estado nutricional global do paciente, níveis séricos baixos de séricos de pré-albumina podem ser vistos como um sinal de maior risco de desnutrição, exigindo uma avaliação nutricional mais extensa. A análise sérica de pré-albumina pode ser usada para o monitoramento de pacientes recebendo suporte nutricional.