Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Journal of Islamic Dental Association of Iran [The]-JIDA. 2014; 26 (1): 43-50
in Persian | IMEMR | ID: emr-141916

ABSTRACT

Orthodontic bracket bonding may encounter difficulties in fluorosed teeth. The aims of this study were to compare the shear bond strength [SBS] of brackets bonded to fluorosed teeth with Core Max II and Transbond XT and to assess the enamel damage after debonding. In this in-vitro study, 60 fluorosed [TFI=4 and 5] and non-fluorosed teeth were divided into two subgroups. The standard edgewise metallic brackets were bonded to the teeth with Transbond XT in the first and third groups, and with Core Max II in the remaining groups. After bonding, the SBS of the brackets was tested with a universal testing machine. The obtained data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA, post-hoc [LSD], Kruskal-Wallis, Wilcoxon, and paired samples tests. Fluorosis significantly reduced SBS [P =0.041]. Core Max II significantly increased SBS [P =0.040]. Teeth in group 4 [fluorosis and Transbond XT] had the lowest SBS [13.44 +/- 1.69 MPa]; group 2 [fluorosis and Core Max II] showed the highest enamel damage. Core Max II is a good adhesive for orthodontic bracket bonding in fluorosed teeth but conservative debonding methods should be necessarily applied to decrease enamel damage


Subject(s)
Shear Strength , Dental Bonding , Resin Cements , Fluorosis, Dental , Dental Enamel , Dental Debonding , Dental Cements
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL