Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Clinics ; 66(11): 1943-1948, 2011. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-605876

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: A lack of attention has been given to hearing health in primary care in developing countries. A strategy involving low-cost screening tools may fill the current gap in hearing health care provided to children. Therefore, it is necessary to establish and adopt lower-cost procedures that are accessible to underserved areas that lack other physical or human resources that would enable the identification of groups at risk for hearing loss. The aim of this study was to develop and analyze the efficacy of a low-cost screening tool to identify and classify hearing loss in children. METHODS: A total of 214 2-to-10 year-old children participated in this study. The study was conducted by providing a questionnaire to the parents and comparing the answers with the results of a complete audiological assessment. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed, and discriminant analysis techniques were used to classify each child based on the total score. RESULTS: We found conductive hearing loss in 39.3 percent of children, sensorineural hearing loss in 7.4 percent and normal hearing in 53.3 percent. The discriminant analysis technique provided the following classification rule for the total score on the questionnaire: 0 to 4 points - normal hearing; 5 to 7 points - conductive hearing loss; over 7 points - sensorineural hearing loss. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the questionnaire could be used as a screening tool to classify children with normal hearing or hearing loss and according to the type of hearing loss based on the total questionnaire score.


Subject(s)
Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Developing Countries , Hearing Tests , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Parents , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Brazil/epidemiology , Developing Countries/statistics & numerical data , Epidemiologic Methods , Family Health , Government Programs/methods , Government Programs/standards , Hearing Loss/classification , Hearing Loss/epidemiology , Mass Screening/economics , Mass Screening/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL