ABSTRACT
This article discusses how ethnic conflicts negatively affect human rights and how international intervention acts for the defense of these rights. We thus compare the structure by which ethnic conflicts are triggered and an ideal scenario in which the state is capable of guaranteeing human rights, in keeping with the United Nations perspective. While identifying the points at which ethnic conflicts breach the foundations of human rights, we analyze a second scenario in which it is impossible to guarantee such rights, raising the issue of humanitarian intervention. Finally, we argue that although human rights have gained relevance in the post-Cold War period, they do not constitute a cohesive set of objectives. Therefore, in order to understand the selectiveness behind humanitarian interventions, we conclude that it is essential to consider other interests.
Dans cet article, on examine comment les conflits ethniques atteignent de façon négative les droits de l'homme et comment a lieu l'intervention internationale en vue de la défense de ces droits. Pour cela, on oppose la structure qui déclenche des conflits ethniques et un cadre idéal où l'État serait capable d'assurer l'exercice des droits humains, selon loptique soutenue par les Nations Unies. Ainsi, à mesure qu'on dénonce les points où ce genre de conflit mine les fondements de ces droits, on construit un deuxième cadre où ils ne sont pas assurés, et c'est là que se pose la question de l'intervention humanitaire. Enfin, on observe que, malgré l'importance des droits humains dans l'après-Guerre Froide, ils ne forment pas une association d'objectifs. Il faut donc, pour comprendre les critères de sélection qui commandent les interventions humanitaires, prendre en compte d'autres intérêts.
ABSTRACT
No presente artigo, os autores desenvolvem temas que se destacam, na atualidade, a respeito do lugar das distintas instituições de produção de conhecimento. Consideram as novas modalidades de financiamento de pesquisa existentes e os novos padrões de avaliação e monitoramento de produção científica praticados por agências nacionais e internacionais.
This article examines some of the major themes related to the current role of various knowledge-producing institutions. The authors discuss new developments in the financing of research and the new standards employed by both Brazilian and international entities in evaluating and monitoring scientific production.
ABSTRACT
De que forma a evolução da estrutura institucional do Mercosul, desde sua criação até sua atual conformação, facilita a transformação de conflitos econômico-comerciais, de menor e maior grau, em conflitos políticos. Acredita-se que uma parte significativa dos conflitos no Mercosul poderia ser solucionada tecnicamente, sem resvalar nas relações políticas globais dos Estados membros, como tem ocorrido regularmente.
How, since its creation, has the evolving institutional structure of Mercosul helped turn economic and trade disagreements of varying magnitudes into political conflicts? It is believed that a significant portion of the disagreements within Mercosul could be solved at the technical level, without becoming the basis of foreign policy rifts, as is often the case.