ABSTRACT
Background: : Judicious use of hysteroscopy to manage abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) adds a new dimension in handling this perplexing problem. Hysteroscopy combined with histological examination is the new “Gold Standard” for evaluating a case of abnormal uterine bleeding Objectives: To study Diagnostic accuracy of hysteroscopy in relation to histopathology in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding Methods: A hospital based diagnostic accuracy study was carried out among 100 women with abnormal uterine bleeding. All patients underwent the procedure of hysteroscopy. Samples were collected in all patients for histopathology confirmation of the hysteroscopy findings. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy were calculated for hysteroscopy in comparison to gold standard histopathology. Results: Majority of the women belonged to 40-49 years (41%). Majority (37%) reported after one year of occurrence of the symptoms. Majority (54%) had menorrhagia. Hysteroscopy was found to be having good sensitivity and specificity in comparison to gold standard histopathology. Sensitivity=97.7%; specificity=78.5%, positive predictive value=78.1%; negative predictive value=97.7%; diagnostic accuracy=87% for hysteroscopy in comparison to histopathology. Conclusion: Hysteroscopy is simple to perform and provides direct visualization of the uterus cavity and the endo-cervical canal. In abnormal uterine bleeding, quick and safe diagnosis is possible by hysteroscopy. In cases of endometrial polyp and sub mucous myoma which are pedunculated structures, diagnostic accuracy is greater with hysteroscopy and can be treated during the procedure itself. Thus, Hysteroscopic guided biopsy and histopathology is considered as new “Gold Standard” in diagnosis and often treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding.