Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Anaesthesia, Pain and Intensive Care. 2016; 20 (4): 429-435
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-185610

ABSTRACT

Background: A variety of minimally invasive techniques [chemonucleolysis, laser, automated percutaneous discectomy, percutaneous manual nucleotomy] have been invented over the years, as treatment of low back pain related to disc disease. Automated percutaneous lumbar dissectomy [APLD], being one of these techniques, is a modality in which removal of nucleus pulposus, reduces intradiscal pressure thus relieves the nerve root compression and subsequently reduces radicular pain. This technique was introduced by Onik in 1985, referred to as 'automated' since it involves a mechanical probe, working by a 'suction and cutting action for removal of the nucleus pulposus


Methodology: After meeting the inclusion criteria, minimal invasive procedure - APLD, performed in between 2012 to 2015 on 120 patients on outdoor basis. Radicular discogenic pain was confirmed by MRI and clinical finding, procedure is being performed using nucleotome under fluoroscopic guidance


Result: Based on patient satisfaction, 72 [60%] patients had excellent pain relief [75 - 100%], 34 [28.3%] had good pain relief [51-74%] whereas 14 [11.7%] patients had poor pain relief. Two [1.6%] patient developed discitis, which was the only complication and it resolved within fifteen days without sequelae


Conclusion: Percutaneous decompression [APLD] techniques for intervertebral disc herniation are safe and cost-effective techniques with significant and long lasting results concerning pain reduction and mobility improvement. They can be proposed as initial treatment or attractive alternatives prior to major surgery

2.
The Korean Journal of Pain ; : 260-265, 2014.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-221022

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the results of conventional radiofrequency thermorhizotomy (CRT) for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) in patients with failed medical management. METHODS: Patients with Trigeminal neuralgia who were referred to us for 'limited intervention' during the time frame July-2011 to Jan-2013 were enrolled for this study. CRT was administered by the Sweet technique. Pain relief was evaluated by the principle investigator. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were enrolled and completed a mean follow-up of 18.0 months. Pain relief was observed in 14 of 18 (77.8%) patients on the post-operative day, 14 of 18 (77.8%) at 1-month follow-up, 14 of 17 (82.4%) at 3-months follow-up, 12 of 15 (80%) at 6-months follow-up, 7 of 11 (63.6%) at 1-year follow-up and 2 of 6 (33.3%) 1.5 years of follow-up. Four patients required a repeat cycle of CRT; two at six months of follow-up and two at one year of follow-up. One patient was transferred for surgical intervention at six months of follow-up. Side-effects included facial hypoesthesia (n = 6); nausea/vomiting (n = 2), diminished corneal reflex (n = 13) and difficulty in chewing (n = 11). Severity of adverse effects gradually diminished and none of the patients who are beyond 6 months of follow-up have any functional limitation. CONCLUSIONS: CRT is an effective method of pain relief for patients with Trigeminal neuralgia. Successful outcome (excellent or good) can be expected in 66.7% of patients after first cycle of CRF. The incidence and severity of adverse effects is less and the procedure is better tolerated by the patients.


Subject(s)
Humans , Follow-Up Studies , Hypesthesia , Incidence , Mastication , Reflex , Research Personnel , Trigeminal Ganglion , Trigeminal Neuralgia
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL